Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 8:38 AM Adam Rice wrote: > While plumbing use counters from //net back into Blink would be > technically possible, it would be a lot of work and we'd need some > compelling user benefit to justify it. > Could we simply add UMA instead? > > In this case, just having a ki

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

While plumbing use counters from //net back into Blink would be technically possible, it would be a lot of work and we'd need some compelling user benefit to justify it. In this case, just having a kill switch seems sufficient. On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 16:26, Yoav Weiss wrote: > Thanks for workin

[blink-dev] Intent to Remove: CSS property -webkit-highlight

Contact emailsschen...@chromium.org, spectran...@igalia.com ExplainerNone SpecificationNone Summary The CSS property -webkit-highlight is intended to highlight text, but was never standardized. It has no visible effect in chromium (it is parsed but never used in rendering content). The property

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

Thanks for the details and your guidance by the way David! It's helpful. On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:09 PM David Benjamin wrote: > Not an expert in our HTTP auth code overall, but I don't see any metrics > for specifically digest auth vs. other HTTP auth types either. > > As an upper bound, I woul

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

M117-123 - Deprecation trial What does this mean in terms of when trial registration will be available at https://developer.chrome.com/origintrials/#/trials/active ? I'm the author of an extension that's currently using Web SQL Database. I'd like to take advantage of the deprecation trial wh

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

Agreed that given we don't have metrics proving the usage is really rare, we should err on the side of caution and follow the "all new APIs need a killswitch" guideline here. It should b

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: Deprecate unload event

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 1:47 AM Kenji Baheux wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 1:48 PM Fergal Daly wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 01:16, Rick Byers wrote: >> >>> Hi Fergal, >>> Thanks for pushing through this contentious and challenging deprecation. >>> We discussed this in the API owners

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: Deprecate unload event

On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 14:41, Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi Fergal, > > Nice to have lunch with you today. > On 6/28/23 5:06 PM, 'Fergal Daly' via blink-dev wrote: > > Hi API-owners, > > > I am now asking for permission to go ahead with the following concrete > unload deprecation plan below. > > > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

Thanks for working on this! Would you be able to put this behind a flag , to reduce any risk this might hit in the wild? It'd also be good to add use-counters to know how common these