Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain on stable

This helped us identify the response that did not have the header. We noticed that we have a static html called signon.html as our first entry into the application. Since this is a static html, our servlet changes to add response header does not hit when users invoke this signon.html. I think

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:47 AM David Benjamin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 1:50 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:45 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 1:35 AM 'Jeffrey Yasskin' via blink-dev < >>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi Kyra, Do we have an update on what time the feature will be rolled out today? Cheers, Chinmay On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 18:06:57 UTC+10 Kyra Seevers wrote: > Hi Muhammad, > > I have filed this bug for the issue: > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1481485. We

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 1:50 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:45 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 1:35 AM 'Jeffrey Yasskin' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 4:11 PM David Adrian wrote: >>> > This should

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

> How would we know of breakage in those 10%? Would that look like users filing issues? Something else? Usually we see it reflected in DAU and users filing issues. This is what happened when we had issues during root store deployment. We also have Net.SSL_Connection_Error, which does show a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features (change registration limit, remove 1hr delay)

LGTM3 On Mon, Sep 18, 2023, 3:10 p.m. Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 9/16/23 10:28 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:58 PM 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> johni...@chromium.org, csharri...@chromium.org >> >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: "is-cross-site" bit in the HTTP Cache Partitioning Key

Hey everyone, TL;DR: We'd like to extend the experiment with some modifications, and are requesting an LGTM for this. As part of the experiment we found that enabling the HTTP cache for opaque origin contexts (and having those cache partitions be shared among third-party contexts) resulted in

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Horizontal rules inside select elements

Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9124 Summary This feature makes the HTML parser allow tags inside tags. These elements create horizontal borders in between elements in the listbox popup, which we already support if you

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Garbage Collection (WasmGC)

Browser Compatibility Data PR happening here: https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/pull/20576.  On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, 09:07 Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 7:24 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> LGTM2 - thanks Adam. >> On 9/16/23 7:39 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >>

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Feature detection for supported clipboard formats

Why is it not applicable? Note that this API is already in the clipboard spec and was approved by the EditingWG members. I wasn't sure if we would need TAG to review it after it was approved by representatives from

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Garbage Collection (WasmGC)

LGTM3 On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 7:24 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 - thanks Adam. > On 9/16/23 7:39 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:13 PM Adam Klein wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply, Mike. I'm going to fill in some of this to avoid >> blocking over the weekend. >>

[blink-dev] [ChromesStatus] Launching streamlined intent process

Hi all, We are pleased to announce that a streamlined and more transparent intent process has launched in the ChromeStatus tool! As some of you might have already seen, ChromeStatus now has the following review/approval gates enabled. These gates will be applicable to features that are

[blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CaptureStartFocusBehavior enum value "focus-capturing-application"

Contact emails fbeauf...@google.com elada...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/WICG/conditional-focus/blob/main/README.md Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/screen-capture/#idl-def-CaptureStartFocusBehavior.focus-capturing-application Summary The Screen Capture API lets the user

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Feature detection for supported clipboard formats

Interesting problem, never thought about this ergonomic problem.On Sep 19, 2023, at 2:12, 'Anupam Snigdha' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails sni...@microsoft.com, sa...@microsoft.com, est...@chromium.org, jsb...@chromium.org, asu...@chromium.org Explainer