Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:52 PM Alex Turner wrote: > Contact emailsale...@chromium.org > > Specification > >- > >Null report fixes: >https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/91 >- > >Debug mode eligibility changes: >https://github.com/patcg-

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: DTLS ClientHello extension permutation (WebRTC)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:47 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Great follow up to > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/bYZK81WxYBo/m/lKLrZ_P2BwAJ. > Big fan! > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:00 AM 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chrom

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

LGTM1 On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:42 PM David Adrian wrote: > To make it easier for people who are not following the IETF to understand > the impact on browsers and Chrome, I have provided a brief explainer: > https://github.com/dadrian/ech-chrome > Thanks for the explainer. A brief paragraph RE

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

I think the correct specification address would be https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-4/#typedef-bg-clip In css-backgrounds-4 also added `border` value, should we support it when removing the prefix? Maybe this needs to be discussed further by the CSSWG. 在2023年9月27日星期三 UTC+8 06:04:54 写道：

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

Is there any interest in doing the same for -webkit-text-fill-color? The two get typically used in combination for gradient effects: https://github.com/tomayac/blogccasion/blob/6ee3722011661db7a0c95c4379d7905bd8e95404/css/main.css#L100-L113. (See any of the headings on https://blog.tomayac.com/ for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Compression dictionary transport with Shared Brotli

It's probably also worth noting that adding encodings to the compression streams API would require browsers to bundle the compression code for the relevant encodings (where they only pull in the decompression code for network-level content encodings). Not saying the discussions shouldn't happen, j

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Open popups as fullscreen windows

Contact emails btri...@chromium.org, m...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/window-management/blob/main/EXPLAINER_fullscreen_popups.md Specification https://github.com/w3c/window-management/blob/main/EXPLAINER_fullscreen_popups.md#spec-changes Design docs https://github.com/w3c/w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: DTLS ClientHello extension permutation (WebRTC)

Great follow up to https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/bYZK81WxYBo/m/lKLrZ_P2BwAJ. Big fan! On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:00 AM 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails > phan...@microsoft.com, h...@chromium.org > > Specification > https://d

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

To make it easier for people who are not following the IETF to understand the impact on browsers and Chrome, I have provided a brief explainer: https://github.com/dadrian/ech-chrome On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 1:48 PM David Adrian wrote: > I'll note that Chrome does not require that the HTTPS RR be

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: User-Agent Client Hints on Android WebView

Hi blink-dev, User-agent client hint is currently ramping up to 100% of the stable release population, enabling default TOT on Android WebView. Best, Victor On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 1:09:55 PM UTC-4 Victor Tan wrote: > Hi blink-dev, > > User-agent client hint is currently ramping up

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebRTC Codec Selection API

LGTM3 On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:23 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 9/21/23 5:31 AM, 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev wrote: > > Am Do., 21. Sept. 2023 um 10:43 Uhr schrieb Florent Castelli < > orp...@chromium.org>: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:21 PM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> LGTM1 >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Compression dictionary transport with Shared Brotli

We had put the compression stream API out of scope for the dictionary work because the dictionaries would require a different constructor that allows for specifying the dictionary bytes (or stream). That's independent of sup

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Compression dictionary transport with Shared Brotli

Hey folks, Glad to see there's excitement around the OT; was wondering if there has been any work to extend Compression Streams for zstd as part of this effort? I don't see it in the explainer, and it would be great for us not to be adding new ecodings that aren't also exposed to userland. Bes

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

To clarify, I meant that we should apply this to WebRTC *in a separate launch*. This one will just be HTTPS. We don't have numbers or a flag for WebRTC right now, and we usually end up doing WebRTC separately anyway, for better or worse. :-) On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 12:31 PM David Benjamin wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

Ah yeah, we should apply this to WebRTC too. Based on the kinds of issues we've seen, hopefully that one will be easy (I wouldn't expect WebRTC to be impacted by the kinds of server bugs we've seen), but certainly we'll need numbers. Measurement is a little complicated for HTTPS (we had to do this

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Fire beforeinput event before compositionupdate event during IME composition.

FWIW, according to https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1484762 we previously had compositonupdate->beforeinput but inadvertently changed it to the current order around M52. On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 8:04 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi there - > > Given that this change is web observa

[blink-dev] PSA: CSS Counters rework

Hello! I want to announce that css counters have been reworked and are now up-to-date with the spec. There are some behaviour changes coming with it, but they will not be noticeable for most use cases. Also, the style containment works correctly now. Firefox is already up-to-date (with the spec wi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi, Is this enabled by default to chrome dev without the use or feature flag ? Also is there any example of host_permissions that is mentioned here because I don't think this is working with the chrome

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Storage Access API with Prompts

Belatedly updating this thread in case folks are monitoring it -- we've enabled this feature on 1% of Chrome Stable (M117) clients. We'll update this thread again when we roll out to a higher percentage. As a reminder: if people would like to test this feature out before we've fully shipped it,

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Fire beforeinput event before compositionupdate event during IME composition.

Hi there - Given that this change is web observable, have you all done any compatibility testing or analysis to ensure sites aren't relying on the differences between engines here (hopefully not, but you know...)? On 9/25/23 7:59 PM, 'Siye Liu' via blink-dev wrote: Hi blink-dev, We've been

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds/#background-clip Summary It allows to use the unprefixed version for background-clip: text and makes -webkit-background-clip an alias for background-clip. Also, it drops support for non-suffixed keywords (c

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Face-Framing API.

Contact emails rijubrata.bhau...@intel.com, eero.hakki...@intel.com, fbeauf...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/riju/faceFraming/blob/main/explainer.md Specification https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-extensions/#exposing

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CaptureStartFocusBehavior enum value "focus-capturing-application"

I'm happy to answer the remaining questions if any. On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 7:13 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:45 PM François Beaufort > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:26 PM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:49 PM 'François

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

Should/can this also be applied to WebRTC's DTLS connections? (we don't have numbers but that can be fixed) Am Mo., 25. Sept. 2023 um 19:13 Uhr schrieb Yoav Weiss < yoavwe...@chromium.org>: > LGTM1 to remove support, given that 0.009% of TLS connections divided by > ~30 is roughly at our typical