[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

Contact emailsjap...@chromium.org, dome...@chromium.org, jar...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/close-watcher/blob/main/README.md Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9462 Summary "Close requests" are a new concept that encompasses user requests to close something curr

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Device Bound Session Credentials (DBSC)

Contact emails kristi...@chromium.org, arn...@chromium.org, chl...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/kmonsen/dbsc/blob/main/README.md Specification None Summary An API that will allow websites to securely bind a session to a single device. The browser will renew the session periodic

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Third-party cookie deprecation exemption heuristics

Contact emails amal...@chromium.org rtarp...@chromium.org wanderv...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/amaliev/3pcd-exemption-heuristics/blob/main/explainer.md Specification TBD Summary This proposal examines a heuristics-based pattern of allowing temporary third-party cookie acces

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: 'firstrender' event

Contact emails bo...@chromium.org, khushalsa...@chromium.org, nrosent...@chromium.org, vmp...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/view-transitions/blob/main/cross-doc-explainer.md (See https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/9315 for design discussion around this event specifically) Sp

[blink-dev] Re: PSA: Minor additions to WebGPU

Presumably these are developer-expose changes. Can you please file an Intent-to-prototype-and-ship for them? On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:44:21 AM UTC-7 Corentin Wallez wrote: > Hey all, > > We are doing two minor additions to WebGPU that we believe have zero > compatibility risk: > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

I set this feature up as a "Web developer facing change to existing code", but I'm seeing that "New feature incubation" may have been more appropriate (although the guidance is a bit uncertain). Unfortunately, that means chromestatu

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

Contact emails cam...@chromium.org jkar...@chromium.org ale...@chromium.org yao...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/shared-storage Specification https://wicg.github.io/shared-storage/ Summary We plan to ship the following changes to the Shared Storage API: 1. Only al

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

Yup, it's finch-gated. (Finch feature name in the original email.) On Wed, Sep 27, 2023, 11:11 Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 (for the original request, just to be clear) > > I assume it will have the normal flag that will allow it to be turned off > if our interpretation is incorrect, since it i

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:14 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:52 PM Alex Turner wrote: > >> Contact emailsale...@chromium.org >> >> Specification >> >>- >> >>Null report fixes: >>https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/91 >>- >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

Please also fill out the other chromestatus review categories for this Intent, in particular for Privacy and Security, thanks. On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:14 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:52 PM Alex Turner wrote: > >> Contact emailsale...@chromium.org >> >> Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: DTLS ClientHello extension permutation (WebRTC)

LGTM3 On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:56 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-09-27 12:02, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:50 AM Philipp Hancke < > philipp.han...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Am Mi., 27. Sept. 2023 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Yoav Weiss < >> yoavwe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audiences Negative Targeting

Please fill out the other chromestatus review categories (privacy, security, etc); we'll re-review once those are done. On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 2:42 PM 'Orr Bernstein' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails > > o...@google.com, pauljen...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > ht

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CaptureStartFocusBehavior enum value "focus-capturing-application"

LGTM3 We also briefly reviewed the other review categories (privacy, security, etc) and deemed them unlikely to create an issue in this case. On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:58 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-09-26 11:28, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: > > I'm happy t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

LGTM3 On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 8:11 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 (for the original request, just to be clear) > > I assume it will have the normal flag that will allow it to be turned off > if our interpretation is incorrect, since it is so hard to measure with a > high accuracy. > > /Daniel

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

LGTM2 (for the original request, just to be clear) I assume it will have the normal flag that will allow it to be turned off if our interpretation is incorrect, since it is so hard to measure with a high accuracy. /Daniel On 2023-09-26 18:33, David Benjamin wrote: To clarify, I meant that we

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CaptureStartFocusBehavior enum value "focus-capturing-application"

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-09-26 11:28, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: I'm happy to answer the remaining questions if any. On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 7:13 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:45 PM François Beaufort wrote: On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: DTLS ClientHello extension permutation (WebRTC)

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-09-27 12:02, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:50 AM Philipp Hancke wrote: Am Mi., 27. Sept. 2023 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Yoav Weiss : On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:47 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev wrote: Great foll

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

It allows to use the unprefixed version for background-clip: text and makes -webkit-background-clip an alias for background-clip. Also, it drops support for non-suffixed keywords (content, padding and border) for better round-trip with alias. Can you clarify exactly what this means? I'm perfec

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement: Fluent Scrollbars.

I disagree- the default in Windows apps seems to be the hidden mode, and it seems counterintuitive to implement windows like scrollbars without mirroring the actual Windows experience. I realize it probably won't be the default mode, but if it's possible to at least leave it as a setting for t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: DTLS ClientHello extension permutation (WebRTC)

LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:50 AM Philipp Hancke < philipp.han...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am Mi., 27. Sept. 2023 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Yoav Weiss < > yoavwe...@chromium.org>: > >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:47 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Gr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: DTLS ClientHello extension permutation (WebRTC)

Am Mi., 27. Sept. 2023 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Yoav Weiss < yoavwe...@chromium.org>: > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:47 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Great follow up to >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/bYZK81WxYBo/m/lKLrZ_P2BwAJ. >> B

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

Also forgot to mention: the highest use counter for unsuffixed keyword is 0.08 - and among those I've analyzed 80% of websites and all of them use suffixed *-box version, so it's safe to remove. On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 9:49:35 AM UTC+2 Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:38 AM 一丝 wrote: > I think the correct specification address would be > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-4/#typedef-bg-clip > > In css-backgrounds-4 also added `border` value, should we support it when > removing the prefix? Maybe this needs to be discussed