[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

Hi Alex, Just in case, I file a TAG review issue: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/905 Regards, Traian On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:22 PM Traian Captan wrote: > Hi Alex, > > The much larger intersection observer feature went through a TAG review in >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

Hi Alex, The much larger intersection observer feature went through a TAG review in https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/197, and this is only a minor addition to that. Regards, Traian On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:43 PM Alex Russell wrote: > This looks relatively non-controversial,

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Accordion pattern using name attribute on elements

Contact emailsdba...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://open-ui.org/components/accordion.explainer Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9400 Summary This feature adds the ability to construct exclusive accordions using a sequence of HTML elements. It adds a name attribute to the

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

The implicit behaviours based on construction order in this API are very strange and seem like footguns. The TAG feedback didn't touch on this very much, AFAICT, but it's somewhat surprising that the stack of close actions isn't inspectable. What's the behaviour of non-`destroy()`'d watchers;

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

Please also make sure to complete all of the other shipping gate reviews . Thanks! Chris On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 5:01 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 7:14 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Back/forward cache NotRestoredReasons API

Please also make sure to complete all of the other shipping gate reviews . Thanks! Chris On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 8:46 AM 'Yuzu Saijo' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Sounds good, I will create a

Re: [blink-dev] [ChromesStatus] Launching streamlined intent process

Quick additional note: these six gate categories *may end up delaying API owner approval for a feature* if they are applicable, so please make sure to get them started early in the shipping process. On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 8:33 AM 'Johnny Stenback' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

This looks relatively non-controversial, but why wasn't a TAG review requested? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

hrm, this is another instance of bikeshedding after shipping, and I'm not inclined to approve. Perhaps we can discuss at next week's API OWNERs meeting? Adding others who I know are interested in this topic. On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:16:13 AM UTC-7 Joey Arhar wrote: > The spec for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: First-party sets

Thanks for the updates Chris! On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:36 PM Chris Fredrickson wrote: > Hi all, > > We've concluded our metrics analysis, and are rolling this feature out to > 100% of Chrome Stable clients. (We mitigated one regression in browser > startup time, and confirmed that all other

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: First-party sets

Hi all, We've concluded our metrics analysis, and are rolling this feature out to 100% of Chrome Stable clients. (We mitigated one regression in browser startup time, and confirmed that all other possible regressions were false positives.) Thank you for your patience. By way of other updates,

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

The spec for the new syntax hasn't been merged yet, I haven't finished implementing it in chromium yet, and I don't have estimated milestones yet, but I'd like to get the API owners thoughts on whether this deprecation would be acceptable to help guide the spec discussion. I did some analysis of

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8467 Summary CSS custom state, which allows custom elements to expose their own pseudo-classes, was shipped here: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/dJibhmzE73o/m/VT-NceIhAAAJ

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: WebUSB Interface Class Filtering

Due to an issue with Chrome being unable to do getUserMedia() UVC cameras on Android (see here ) - I was hoping I could use WebUSB as a workaround to get video data from an external device. However, while I can query for