Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Media Previews opt-out

2024-05-10 Thread mark a. foltz
I'm fine with shortening the trial, as long as extensions are possible in case we need longer to ship a long-term solution. On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:39 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 2:40 PM mark a. foltz wrote: > >> Contact emailsmfo...@chromium.org, bryantchand...@ch

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Element Capture

2024-05-10 Thread Mike Taylor
Note: Because you're asking for a renewal of 6 milestones, this will require 3 LGTMs. Can you clarify which milestones you're asking for? You've written "(2024-May-14 to 2024-Jun-04)" - that range maps to M125 and M126 stable releases. On 5/10/24 6:44 AM, 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev wrote: H

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Media Previews opt-out

2024-05-10 Thread Vladimir Levin
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 2:40 PM mark a. foltz wrote: > Contact emailsmfo...@chromium.org, bryantchand...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specification > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZnX2JROjr9l4y2_OPMpfVlLOo-A5cQzD4mWarj9kXQ0/edit > > Design docs > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers Opt Out

2024-05-10 Thread Vladimir Levin
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 2:18 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Is there a chromestatus entry associated with this intent? There's a lot > of information missing from this Intent (see > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/LwgSKPBivuM/m/0dRsXWhBAgAJ > as what is typical) - could you reply

[blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Media Previews opt-out

2024-05-10 Thread mark a. foltz
Contact emailsmfo...@chromium.org, bryantchand...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specification https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZnX2JROjr9l4y2_OPMpfVlLOo-A5cQzD4mWarj9kXQ0/edit Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZnX2JROjr9l4y2_OPMpfVlLOo-A5cQzD4mWarj9kXQ0/edit Summary Allow coordin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Origin Trial for Third Party Cookie Deprecation

2024-05-10 Thread Mike Taylor
This intent is also missing the normal info we have in I2Es, but I found https://chromestatus.com/feature/5133113939722240. LGTM to experiment from M127 to M130 inclusive. On 5/10/24 9:38 AM, Joshua Hood wrote: Contact emails j...@chromium.org wanderv...@chromi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers Opt Out

2024-05-10 Thread Mike Taylor
Is there a chromestatus entry associated with this intent? There's a lot of information missing from this Intent (see https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/LwgSKPBivuM/m/0dRsXWhBAgAJ as what is typical) - could you reply with the missing info? (Did you use ChromeStatus to gene

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers Opt Out

2024-05-10 Thread Di Zhang
Contact emails dizha...@chromium.org dom-...@google.com *Experiment Goals*The feature KeyboardFocusableScrollers changes the focusability of a a scroll container. This is an important improvement to help make scrollers and contents within scrollers more accessible to all users. The goal of th

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Origin Trial for Third Party Cookie Deprecation

2024-05-10 Thread Joshua Hood
Contact emails j...@chromium.org wanderv...@chromium.org Experiment Goals The primary goal of the origin trial is to allow sites to perform broader testing of long-term alternatives to third-party cookies, ahead of the eventual phaseout of third-party cookies scheduled to take place in early 20

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Element Capture

2024-05-10 Thread 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev
Hello Blink owners, We are asking for a breaking period of 3 weeks to this API, followed by a renewed experiment for the traditional 6 milestones (2024-May-14 to 2024-Jun-04). A request that seems similar to me was granted

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Tabbed web apps

2024-05-10 Thread TAMURA, Kent
LGTM3. On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 2:41 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 5/9/24 10:48 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > Thanks for these clarifications. > > LGTM1 > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:05 PM Daniel Murphy wrote: > >> We don't have an objection to this feature existing - it's actually >> curr