Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

To be honest we haven't looked deeply into Android support given we didn't have any active partners for that, and it is not a core platform for our team at Intel. I did check out apps like AIDA64 and CPU-Z and they report 0% utilization on my Pixel phone. Some apps like "CPU monitor" show utilizat

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

There were some fresh concerns raised about the shape of the spec PR which are being hashed out on that review thread. I will give it approval once we reach a consensus there. On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:30 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-size-adjust with the two-value syntax

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:00 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote: > Hi Philip, > > I noticed that font-size-adjust-012.html, font-size-adjust-013.html, and > parts of font-size-adjust-computed.html (e.g., ch-width and ic-width) show > minor deviations from expected results. The exact issue with the WPT Linux

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-size-adjust with the two-value syntax

Thank you for looking into the test failures, ChangSeok! LGTM1 to align with Firefox and Safari on the remaining failures (except the reftests with minor pixel differences) and shipping! On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:05 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > Thanks for your add-up! And Yes, we c

[blink-dev] Support for SharedArrayBuffer API and WASM Sqlite in WebView

Hi, We maintain a web application that previously used WebSQL, and that has been migrated to the WASM implementation of Sqlite. This works well in the newer versions of Chrome, but it seems it doesn't work in an Android application some of our customers use, that is implemented using WebView.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-size-adjust with the two-value syntax

LGTM2 On 5/23/24 12:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Thank you for looking into the test failures, ChangSeok! LGTM1 to align with Firefox and Safari on the remaining failures (except the reftests with minor pixel differences) and shipping! On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:05 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Support for SharedArrayBuffer API and WASM Sqlite in WebView

That's correct, WebView doesn't support this as per https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40914606#comment5. @Ayu Ishii , what's the status of WebSQL in WebView, is it still available (I think it is)? On Thu, May 23, 2024, 18:29 'Antonio MORENO' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [blink-dev] Support for SharedArrayBuffer API and WASM Sqlite in WebView

WebSQL in Webview is still available but deprecated. It's recommended to not use it as it will be removed entirely in ~ 18 months. On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:09 AM 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > That's correct, WebView doesn't support this as per > https://issue

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-size-adjust with the two-value syntax

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:00 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote: > Hi Philip, > > I noticed that font-size-adjust-012.html, font-size-adjust-013.html, and > parts of font-size-adjust-computed.html (e.g., ch-width and ic-width) show > minor deviations from expected results. The exact issue with the WPT Linux >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Third-party Cookie Grace Period Opt-Out

In anticipation of approval here, we have a small tool to help people validate their well-known files accessible at https://3pcd-mitigations-wrv.glitch.me. On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 1:19:23 PM UTC-4 Anton Maliev wrote: > > Each grace period entry has its own expiration date, depending on whe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Experiment: Skip Ad in Picture-in-Picture window

Are you looking to ship this feature or just experiment? If you're looking to ship please send a new email with a corrected subject and contents, and request API owners review on chromestatus.com. On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:43 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > I went ahead and marked the review as star

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Third-party Cookie Grace Period Opt-Out

LGTM1 On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:53 AM 'Jonathan Njeunje' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > In anticipation of approval here, we have a small tool to help people > validate their well-known files accessible at > https://3pcd-mitigations-wrv.glitch.me. > > On Thursday, May 16, 2024

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Experiment: Skip Ad in Picture-in-Picture window

Hi Chris, We are looking to ship this feature to Stable. We have reused an existing chromestatus ( https://chromestatus.com/feature/4749278882824192?gate=4775000754618368) and updated almost every section, including filling all the "Prepare to Ship" section. This email was automatically generated

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Experiment: Skip Ad in Picture-in-Picture window

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 1:10 PM Jiaming Cheng wrote: > Hi Chris, > > We are looking to ship this feature to Stable. We have reused an existing > chromestatus ( > https://chromestatus.com/feature/4749278882824192?gate=4775000754618368) > and updated almost every section, including filling all the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Third-party Cookie Grace Period Opt-Out

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:15 PM Anton Maliev wrote: > > Will developers have a way of knowing if the current site (where they > may see breakage metrics) is opted-out of the grace period? > > Google is planning to build a site dashboard where developers can check on > the status of their grace pe

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SkipAd media session action

Updated the subject of this thread. Key links: ChromeStatus: https://chromestatus.com/feature/4749278882824192?gate=4775000754618368 TAG: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/957 Mozilla: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1026 Webkit: https://github.com/WebKit/standa

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unrestricted WebUSB (available only to Isolated Web Apps)

Ty, Mike. Reviews have been requested. On Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 6:31:11 PM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org wrote: > Could you please request the various Privacy, Security, Enterprise, etc. > review gates in your chromestatus entry? > On 5/22/24 1:08 PM, 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev wrote: > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Dispatch selectionchange event per element

LGTM1. Firefox and Safari statuses are strong signals, and the compatibility risk looks very low. On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:07 AM Shuangshuang Zhou < shuangshuang.z...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Dan&Mike, for your concern that Firefox is still failing the WPTs at > https://wpt.fyi/results/selection