Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Coalesce selectionchange events

2024-07-23 Thread Domenic Denicola
LGTM3 On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:07 AM TAMURA, Kent wrote: > LGTM2. > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:19 AM Vladimir Levin > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 3:08 AM Shuangshuang Zhou < >> shuangshuang.z...@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Contact emailsshuangshuang.z...@intel.com >>> >>> Explai

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Capture all screens

2024-07-23 Thread 'Swetha Sivaram' via blink-dev
Hi Vlad Thank you for clarifying the expectations for another extension. Yes, shipping Controlled Frame is within the broader team's scope. It is not a dependency for all customers but a preferred way forward for some of them. Regards Swetha On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 6:16 PM Vladimir Levin wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Coalesce selectionchange events

2024-07-23 Thread TAMURA, Kent
LGTM2. On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:19 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 3:08 AM Shuangshuang Zhou < > shuangshuang.z...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Contact emailsshuangshuang.z...@intel.com >> >> ExplainerNone >> >> Specification >> https://w3c.github.io/selection-api/#scheduling-

[blink-dev] Re: request for clarification: chrome.webAuthenticationProxy

2024-07-23 Thread polyset
upon further investigation, the origin is the extension (which makes sense since this is an extension api), but with webauthn if the origin is chrome-extension://, you have to drop the rp: id field, otherwise the navigator won't pop the enroll modal. When we do drop the `rp: id`, the modal pop

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Coalesce selectionchange events

2024-07-23 Thread Vladimir Levin
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 3:08 AM Shuangshuang Zhou < shuangshuang.z...@intel.com> wrote: > Contact emailsshuangshuang.z...@intel.com > > ExplainerNone > > Specification > https://w3c.github.io/selection-api/#scheduling-selectionhange-event > > Summary > > This feature is not to fire selectionchange

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Capture all screens

2024-07-23 Thread Vladimir Levin
Hi Swetha, Shipping this API in IWAs would indeed show enough progress that allowing some extra time for partners to migrate seems reasonable. I was not aware of the ControlledFrame dependency. Is shipping this also within the team's scope? Generally, if another extension is required, I'd like to

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Sanitizer API

2024-07-23 Thread Daniel Vogelheim
Contact emailsvogelh...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/sanitizer-api/blob/main/explainer.md Specificationhttps://wicg.github.io/sanitizer-api Summary The Sanitizer API offers an easy to use and safe by default HTML Sanitizer API, which developers can use to remove content that ma

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Capture all screens

2024-07-23 Thread 'Swetha Sivaram' via blink-dev
`Do you foresee any challenges in approving an extension of the OT to M136 if we reach this state by M131? ` To clarify further, by "this state" I mean having Isolated Web Apps and the getAllScreensMedia API shipped / close to being shipped while the path to shipping ControlledFrame is being wo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Capture all screens

2024-07-23 Thread 'Swetha Sivaram' via blink-dev
Just so we have a better understanding and make sure we're working towards it, Vlad, you mention that shipping the API on IWA would constitute evidence of substantial progress, to consider an extension of the OT beyond M131. The focus for the team over the next few weeks is to get Isolated Web

[blink-dev] Re: WebGPU on EC2 Windows - requestAdapter Failed to create WebGPU Context Provider

2024-07-23 Thread wenhan chong
Attaching additional output from chrome://gpu showing errors from failure in unattended browser sessions. Some of the browser sessions are also not able to detect nvidia T4s, falling back instead to ANGLE swiftshader device. On Tuesday 23 July 2024 at 16:45:37 UTC+8 wenhan chong wrote: > Hi All

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web Permissions API on WebView

2024-07-23 Thread Mike Taylor
Yep - thanks Peter. The review gates are still part of the process, even for cases such as this. On 7/23/24 4:42 AM, Peter Birk Pakkenberg wrote: I have requested the review gates as mentioned by Domenic, but I do want to point out that this feature has been in production since 2015 in Chrome,

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Shared Storage API enhancement (allow cross-origin script in addModule & align createWorklet)

2024-07-23 Thread Jonathan Hao
Hi Cammie, A question from the security reviewers: Do cross-origin worklet scripts by addModule have the same protection as a cross-origin

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web Permissions API on WebView

2024-07-23 Thread Peter Birk Pakkenberg
I have requested the review gates as mentioned by Domenic, but I do want to point out that this feature has been in production since 2015 in Chrome, and that we're just closing the loop in bringing it to WebView. Sincerely, [image: Google Logo] Peter Birk Pakkenberg Software Engineer pb...@chromi

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Coalesce selectionchange events

2024-07-23 Thread Shuangshuang Zhou
Contact emailsshuangshuang.z...@intel.com ExplainerNone Specification https://w3c.github.io/selection-api/#scheduling-selectionhange-event Summary This feature is not to fire selectionchange event when there is already one pending. For web developers, selectionchange event listeners will be ca

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship:

2024-07-23 Thread Shuangshuang Zhou
Contact emailsshuangshuang.z...@intel.com ExplainerNone Specification https://w3c.github.io/selection-api/#scheduling-selectionhange-event Summary This feature is not to fire selectionchange event when there is already one pending. For web developers, selectionchange event listeners will be ca