Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefixed print-color-adjust

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-03-19 03:51, Vladimir Levin wrote: LGTM2 Is there really no Finch flag here, or is it just not recorded in the email? I'd recommend we have a flag as a risk mitigation. Thanks, Vlad On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 8:32:02 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 On 3

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Update of Canvas text rendering implementation

Contact emailstk...@chromium.org Explainer https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UbHuoflNyLbSavpH86HEmXFGyz2V4uZ6cjNpuuwrtBg/edit?usp=sharing SpecificationNone Summary *This is not a web-exposed change.* The implementation of CanvasRenderingContext2D's measureText(), fillText(), and strokeText()

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefixed print-color-adjust

LGTM2 Is there really no Finch flag here, or is it just not recorded in the email? I'd recommend we have a flag as a risk mitigation. Thanks, Vlad On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 8:32:02 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 > On 3/17/25 8:55 PM, Chromestatus wrote: > > Contact emails chris...@chr

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS if() function

Alex, I trimmed down the quote reply below to point out that Emilio is asking for more web developer feedback. That will take time to get as authors experiment with the prototype. On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:10 AM Alex Russell wrote: > Will second the thanks, Emilio, but will reiterate that Blin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Rename `string` attr() type to `raw-string`

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:21 AM Alex Russell wrote: > Why would we change this? We backed the original intent with the usual > conditions: once the concrete is poured, it's done. I'm not inclined to > approve. That is not, as a general rule, how API owner approval is interpreted, or (as far as

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Update HTTP request headers, body, and referrer policy on CORS redirect

On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 11:38:32 AM UTC-4 Viktoria Zlatinova wrote: Contact emails vizla...@microsoft.com, toyos...@chromium.org, ba...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#http-redirect-fetch Summary Update the HTTP request on CORS redirect by removi

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Update of Canvas text rendering implementation

I'm curious why you decided to do an origin trial instead of a more typical finch roll out + monitoring metrics for performance regressions. Origin trial data would limit us to the feedback of registered partners, which may not be a good representation of usage "in the wild". Separately, are y

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Controlled Frame API (available only to IWAs)

On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 8:39:21 AM UTC+9 Robbie McElrath wrote: Contact emails rmcelr...@chromium.org, ze...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/controlled-frame/blob/main/README.md Specification https://wicg.github.io/controlled-frame This is a large specification effort

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Call stacks in crash reports from unresponsive web pages

LGTM3 On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 8:47:30 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 - I see that Mozilla has proposed a positive position via comment. > On 3/17/25 2:25 PM, 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 11:24:06 AM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org > wrote: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate special font size rules for H1 within some elements

The thing that gives me pause is the nature of the console warning. It isn't that within, say, is deprecated, it's the fact that the special rules will be removed and thus the font size may look different. I'm not sure what action would be suggested for the authors. Can you comment on that? I

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Call stacks in crash reports from unresponsive web pages

 LGTM2 - I see that Mozilla has proposed a positive position via comment. On 3/17/25 2:25 PM, 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev wrote: LGTM1 On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 11:24:06 AM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org wrote: I'm recused on this one, but would like to see it move forward quickly. Gre

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate special font size rules for H1 within some elements

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:15 AM Alex Russell wrote: > This looks good, but I'm not sure I understand the plan. Is it to > deprecate (w/ console warnings) for some period of time? Are you going to > propose a reverse-OT? Or removal once usage falls below some threshold? > Yep, it's a good questi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Link rel=payment to support push payments

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 12:03 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > Thanks for working on this!! > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2025 at 8:00:26 PM UTC+1 junh...@google.com > wrote: > > Thanks! I was syncing with our PM/TPM to provide the best answer of the > enterprise questi

[blink-dev] PSA: Private Proof API Explainer

*Contact Emails* aric...@chromium.org, samschlesin...@chromium.org, phili...@chromium.org, sau...@chromium.org, erictrou...@chromium.org *Explainer* https://explainers-by-googlers.github.io/private-proof/ *Cryptography Whitepaper* https://github.com/SamuelSchlesinger/authenticated-pseudonyms/blob

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Bounce Tracking Mitigations on HTTP Cache

LGTM3 On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:34 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Thanks for getting the spec PR merged - LGTM2 > On 3/17/25 2:57 PM, Andrew Liu wrote: > > > > On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 2:12:47 PM UTC-4 Alex Russell wrote: > > LGTM1 on the condition that this is launched with a fractional rollout a

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Update HTTP request headers, body, and referrer policy on CORS redirect

Contact emails vizla...@microsoft.com, toyos...@chromium.org, ba...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#http-redirect-fetch Summary Update the HTTP request on CORS redir

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Bounce Tracking Mitigations on HTTP Cache

Thanks for getting the spec PR merged - LGTM2 On 3/17/25 2:57 PM, Andrew Liu wrote: On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 2:12:47 PM UTC-4 Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1 on the condition that this is launched with a fractional rollout and good histograms to provide a way to detect breakage as w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefixed print-color-adjust

LGTM1 On 3/17/25 8:55 PM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails chris...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-adjust/#propdef-print-color-adjust Summary The print-color-adjust allows adjusting colors in printed web

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Rename `string` attr() type to `raw-string`

> > Do you have any sense of the relative impact of the breakage for each > site, i.e., does some text look funny (low) vs the page is unusable due to > broken layout or missing content (high)? I assume theoretically there might be missing content, so high. Is there someone on your team that migh