Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add prefetchCache and prerenderCache to Clear-Site-Data header

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 9:48 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 5/20/25 10:07 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > (Feature-collaborator hat on, API owners hat off.) > > Thanks for sending this! A few minor corrections here, that it'd be good > to make to the ChromeStatus entry. > > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 10

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fire error event instead of throwing for CSP blocked worker

LGTM3. Thanks for your patient work on this! On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 6:26 AM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 11:29:13 AM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org > wrote: > >> Sounds good - thanks for the explanation. >> >> LGTM1 >> On 5/21/2

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fire error event instead of throwing for CSP blocked worker

LGTM2 On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 11:29:13 AM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org wrote: > Sounds good - thanks for the explanation. > > LGTM1 > On 5/21/25 12:35 PM, Liang Zhao (REDMOND) wrote: > > Most exception handlers just eat the exception, some output some not > supported message. A few try to fa

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fire error event instead of throwing for CSP blocked worker

Sounds good - thanks for the explanation. LGTM1 On 5/21/25 12:35 PM, Liang Zhao (REDMOND) wrote: Most exception handlers just eat the exception, some output some not supported message. A few try to fallback to data: url, and if that still throws, some just eats the exception (output not supp

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

Per David's last update in the Platform Status tool, LGTM1 On Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 3:21:12 PM UTC-7 obr...@igalia.com wrote: > > I'm inclined to get things into the world > > I'm inclined to not hurry to get things into the world, specially since > you warned the CSSWG that you may block

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Hi! We discussed this at the Audio Working Group and reached a consensus :) I have a PR out to update the spec and another one to update the explainer with the changes. I believe this should

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Gamepad Event-Driven Input API

Contact emails stev...@microsoft.com, snehagar...@microsoft.com, gabrielbr...@microsoft.com, mattreyno...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/GamepadEventDrivenInputAPI/explainer.md Specification None Summary This proposal extends the Gamepad A

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fire error event instead of throwing for CSP blocked worker

Most exception handlers just eat the exception, some output some not supported message. A few try to fallback to data: url, and if that still throws, some just eats the exception (output not support message) and other seems to mark inline service worker as not supported. Don’t see that how that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS sibling-index() and sibling-count()

Wait no, these should be LGTM2 and LGTM3 On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 6:35 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 6:34 PM Vladimir Levin > wrote: > >> CSSWG resolved on this issue >> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10982#issuecomment-2

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS sibling-index() and sibling-count()

Correction: LGTM2, because of Mike Taylor's approval above On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 12:34:48 PM UTC-4 Vladimir Levin wrote: > CSSWG resolved on this issue > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10982#issuecomment-2898572289 > I believe this aligns with option 2 in Yoav's reply. > > L

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS sibling-index() and sibling-count()

LGTM2 On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 6:34 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > CSSWG resolved on this issue > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10982#issuecomment-2898572289 > I believe this aligns with option 2 in Yoav's reply. > > LGTM1 > > Thanks, > Vlad > On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 3:48:18 AM UTC

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS sibling-index() and sibling-count()

CSSWG resolved on this issue https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10982#issuecomment-2898572289 I believe this aligns with option 2 in Yoav's reply. LGTM1 Thanks, Vlad On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 3:48:18 AM UTC-4 Rune Lillesveen wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:38 PM Yoav Weiss (@Sho

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-05-21 17:10, Vladimir Levin wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 11:10:20 AM UTC-4 Alex Russell wrote: Per David's last update in the Platform Status tool, LGTM1 On Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 3:21:12 PM UTC-7 obr...@igalia.com wrote: > I'm i

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

LGTM2 On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 11:10:20 AM UTC-4 Alex Russell wrote: > Per David's last update in the Platform Status tool, LGTM1 > > On Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 3:21:12 PM UTC-7 obr...@igalia.com wrote: > >> > I'm inclined to get things into the world >> >> I'm inclined to not hurry to

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Any conclusions from the WG meeting? On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 8:11:49 PM UTC+2 ev...@google.com wrote: > It would definitely be better to make this change before the feature > ships, but it's up to y'all Blink owners if you think this should be a > blocker for this intent. The Audio Workin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Sign-Related Functions: abs(), sign()

Please note, that I had to cancel shipping it in the original milestone, as it produced a number of crashes. Now they are all fixed and it will be reshipped in M138. On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 12:59:54 PM UTC+1 Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > Hi! I see that it only fails those tests in serialization

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Interpolation progress functional notations: CSS *progress() functions

Please note, that I had to cancel shipping it in the original milestone, as it produced a number of crashes. Now they are all fixed and it will be reshipped in M138. On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 7:45:47 PM UTC+1 Daniel Clark wrote: > Thanks for flagging that. > > > > I was surprised to see th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

On 5/20/25 6:06 AM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails robert...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md#window-name-targeting-hints Specification https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/speculation-rules.html

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fire error event instead of throwing for CSP blocked worker

Thank you for doing this work! One small question below, but this generally seems like it will be safe to land. On 5/20/25 6:45 PM, 'Liang Zhao (REDMOND)' via blink-dev wrote: An update. https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/5356 now has list of urls. I’ve tested those

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add prefetchCache and prerenderCache to Clear-Site-Data header

On 5/20/25 10:07 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: (Feature-collaborator hat on, API owners hat off.) Thanks for sending this! A few minor corrections here, that it'd be good to make to the ChromeStatus entry. On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 10:42 AM Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Changes to the fetch() option `targetAddressSpace`

Thanks for sending the PSA, Chris. On 5/20/25 7:00 PM, Chris Thompson wrote: Hello blink-dev@ -- As part of our work on Local Network Access restrictions (which is superseding a prior effort called Private Network Access

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS sibling-index() and sibling-count()

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:38 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:32 PM Rune Lillesveen > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:47 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < >> yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 6:10 PM Phil