[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HSTS Tracking Prevention

2025-06-03 Thread Domenic Denicola
Thanks for your explanations on the spec points; they make sense to me know. Looking forward to what you find out about the test situation! On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 1:51 AM Ladan Khamnian wrote: > Sure thing and no no worries at all. Thanks for your feedback. > > On Wednesday, May 28, 2025 at 11:5

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Secure Payment Confirmation: UX Refresh

2025-06-03 Thread Chromestatus
Contact emails darwiny...@chromium.org, slobo...@chromium.org, smcgr...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/issues/197 https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/issues/275 Specification None Summary Updates the UX elements for the SPC dialog on

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web app scope extensions

2025-06-03 Thread 'Lu Huang' via blink-dev
Thanks for the link and recommendation. I'll try to add a manual WPT for this feature following the example of the other web app tests. Is this a blocking issue? On Monday, June 2, 2025 at 2:46:28 PM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org wrote: > Multiple origins are possible, yeah: > > > https://web-pla

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HSTS Tracking Prevention

2025-06-03 Thread Ladan Khamnian
Sure thing and no no worries at all. Thanks for your feedback. On Wednesday, May 28, 2025 at 11:52:10 PM UTC-4 Domenic Denicola wrote: Thanks for picking this up, and sorry for adding friction to what I'm sure is already a tricky transition. On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:15 AM Ladan Khamnian wrot

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web app scope extensions

2025-06-03 Thread 'Daniel Clark' via blink-dev
Thanks! I don’t consider it blocking. LGTM1. From: 'Lu Huang' via blink-dev Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9:42 AM To: blink-dev Cc: mike...@chromium.org ; Daniel Clark ; sligh...@chromium.org ; Chromestatus ; Rob Paveza ; dmu...@chromium.org ; Diego Gonzalez ; Lu Huang Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re:

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Translator API

2025-06-03 Thread Mike Taylor
On 6/3/25 9:27 AM, 'Kagami Rosylight' via blink-dev wrote: > They haven’t given any negative signals on our proposed Translator API (nor official positive ones). You can consider Mozilla to be negative here. We plan to make it more clear in our counterproposal why we think it's better. If you

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Translator API

2025-06-03 Thread 'Kagami Rosylight' via blink-dev
> They haven’t given any negative signals on our proposed Translator API (nor official positive ones). You can consider Mozilla to be negative here. We plan to make it more clear in our counterproposal why we think it's better. On Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 12:07:35 AM UTC+2 dbo...@chromium.org w

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-06-03 Thread 'Eric Beach' via blink-dev
I work on Google Meet. For a feature that my subteam is working on which aims to greatly improve user performance and latency, this functionality is critical. On Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 7:19:53 AM UTC-4 Chromestatus wrote: > Contact emails robe...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.