Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Windows default CJK fonts changes

Hi Koji, Thanks for improving the system font choices. Can you share some details in how this is implemented in terms of interfacing with the preferences architecture and changes users may have made in settings for selecting a specific font for CJK languages? Dominik On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-size-adjust with the two-value syntax

Big thanks ChangSeok for implementing this and pushing for this feature. I can say a few things about the open issues > - https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6384 > font-size-adjust relies on a font metric reference point, for example, the x-height, cap-height, etc. in order to scale fon

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-palette property animation

Hi Yoav, On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 6:46 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8922#issuecomment-1720930646 > indicates that some parts of this were resolved and other parts are still > to be bikeshedded. > > Can you expand on that? What's the issue around color space in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS font-variant-emoji

Hi ChangSeok, Could you explain a bit further what the intended outcome of this prototyping will be? From my experience, incorrect presentation style (text/emoji) for emoji is more often a problem of font availability and glyph coverage than it is a problem of controlling the representation. I am

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-variant-position property

Hi David and Rick, It's a shame to me to be holding back interop on the case of fonts having > the superscript or subscript glyphs out of fear for the case where they > don't. Perhaps we can treat the case of font-variant-position being used > with fonts that lack the glyphs as a site bug that we

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS font-size-adjust: two-value syntax

Hi ChangSeok, Thanks for confirming the expected behavior and testing in FF. I plan to implement the same behavior of Firefox, following the spec > document. > Can you share a few more details how you plan to achieve that? Have you been able to verify that you can achieve this behavior in a loca

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS font-size-adjust: two-value syntax

Hi ChangSeok, Thanks for working on this. During the development and shipping of the @font-face size-adjust descriptor we found that at least in our code the font-size-adjust implementation was not compatible with this change. As size-adjust

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto range support for font descriptors inside @font-face rule

Hi Yoav, On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:52 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 5:27 PM 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> moon...@chromium.org, dr...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >> >> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issue

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Variable COLRv1

Hi Yoav, On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 4:35:58 PM UTC+3 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: > OK, so sounds like there's urgency here, or at least we need to coordinate > shipping. > > LGTM1 to ship in the same release as `tech()`. > Thanks! > Does that mean that if we'd want to ship a future

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: tech() function support in @font-face src: descriptor

Hi Theo, On Friday, September 2, 2022 at 3:07:04 PM UTC+2 Theodore Olsauskas-Warren wrote: > (Chrome OWP Privacy reviewer drive-by) > > I'm trying to understand whether the various tech() capabilities are > directly derivable from already exposed information, and this is just a > convenience,

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: tech() function support in @font-face src: descriptor

Contact emailsdr...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-4/#font-face-src-parsing Summary CSS Fonts Level 4 provides additional means of selecting or filtering font resources. The tech() function was introduced, which allows passing in a list of font technolog

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: font-palette and custom @font-palette-values palettes

Thanks all for the quick resolution on this issue! On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 8:06:53 PM UTC+2 mk...@chromium.org wrote: > LGTM3. > > -mike > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM2 >> >> On 3/15/22 11:20 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >> LGTM1 - given the early positive

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: font-palette and custom @font-palette-values palettes

Hi Yoav, On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:18:17 AM UTC+2 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: > Thanks for working on this! Seems like a very cool feature!! :) > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 1:44:55 PM UTC+1 Dominik Röttsches wrote: > >> >> > TAG reviewSafari ships this in beta, smaller CSS feature cl

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: font-palette and custom @font-palette-values palettes

Contact emailsdr...@chromium.org rshee...@google.com Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-4/#propdef-font-palette Summary The font-palette CSS property allows selecting a palette from a color font. In combination with the @font-palette-values at-rule, custom palettes can be defined. Use

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 4:30 PM Rick Byers wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:21 AM Dominik Röttsches > wrote: > >> Hi Rick & Frédéric, >> >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:27 PM Rick Byers wrote: >> >>> >>> I wonder if we have metrics about unrenderable characters? I.e. how >>> often we fail t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

Hi Rick & Frédéric, On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:27 PM Rick Byers wrote: > > I wonder if we have metrics about unrenderable characters? I.e. how often > we fail to render some text because the glyph isn't present in the selected > font? If we did, then I think it would be pretty easy to do a finch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: New Canvas 2D API

Aaron, Fernando, On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:06 AM Aaron Krajeski wrote: > *[...]* > *Specification* > [...] > New Text Modifiers > > For reference here, after a f2f discussion yesterday with Fernando: Please do consid