Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Probabilistic Reveal Tokens

2025-08-01 Thread 'Theodore Olsauskas-Warren' via blink-dev
ven if their particular implementations of a complete IP > protection system are implementation-specific. > Reilly Grant | Software Engineer | rei...@chromium.org | Google Chrome > <https://www.google.com/chrome> > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 1:52 PM 'Theodore Olsauskas-W

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Probabilistic Reveal Tokens

2025-07-28 Thread &#x27;Theodore Olsauskas-Warren&#x27; via blink-dev
Contact emails sau...@google.com, las...@google.com, nick...@google.com, erictrou...@chromium.org, ryanka...@google.com, ayk...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection/blob/main/prt_explainer.md Specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pfeiffenberger

[blink-dev] Ready for Developer Testing: Probabilistic Reveal Tokens

2025-07-14 Thread &#x27;Theodore Olsauskas-Warren&#x27; via blink-dev
Contact emails sau...@google.com, las...@google.com, nick...@google.com, erictrou...@chromium.org, ryanka...@google.com, ayk...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection/blob/main/prt_explainer.md Specification None Summary To ensure that businesses can continue to e

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: tech() function support in @font-face src: descriptor

2022-09-02 Thread &#x27;Theodore Olsauskas-Warren&#x27; via blink-dev
(Chrome OWP Privacy reviewer drive-by) I'm trying to understand whether the various tech() capabilities are directly derivable from already exposed information, and this is just a convenience, or whether otherwise identical UAs might give out different values based on the platform or user confi

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Speculation Rules (Prefetch)

2022-04-19 Thread &#x27;Theodore Olsauskas-Warren&#x27; via blink-dev
Hi Team, Have there been any changes since the conclusion of the previous experiment? Thanks, Theo. On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 12:36:07 AM UTC+2 jbr...@chromium.org wrote: > Contact emails > > jbr...@chromium.org, kenji...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculat

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Auto Dark Mode & the CSS color-scheme “only” keyword

2021-11-09 Thread &#x27;Theodore Olsauskas-Warren&#x27; via blink-dev
Ok great, thanks for clarifying Peter. We (S&P OWP reviewers) didn't have any other concerns. Theo. On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:20 PM Peter Beverloo wrote: > Hi Theodore - apologies for missing this! > > A single model is used for all users, which ships as part of Chromium. The > generated impleme

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Auto Dark Mode & the CSS color-scheme “only” keyword

2021-11-08 Thread &#x27;Theodore Olsauskas-Warren&#x27; via blink-dev
Friendly bump on the above, are the details of the proposed ML model available anywhere? Theo. On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 9:57:29 AM UTC+2 Theodore Olsauskas-Warren wrote: > Privacy clarification question, you've mentioned that an ML model will be > used to distinguish iconography from ph

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Auto Dark Mode & the CSS color-scheme “only” keyword

2021-10-15 Thread &#x27;Theodore Olsauskas-Warren&#x27; via blink-dev
Privacy clarification question, you've mentioned that an ML model will be used to distinguish iconography from photos, I'd like to understand a bit more about that model. Is the model static? Will we be delivering the same model to all users? With what cadence will we be pushing new models? Tha