[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label Throughout 3PC Phaseout

> We are still evaluating possible changes to the labeling configuration in this period between facilitated testing and third-party cookie phase-out. Further guidance will be provided in the coming milestones on any changes to labels. Can you share changes you are evaluating, rationale? >We

[blink-dev] Re: Chromium’s migration to the new issue tracker begins Feb 2

Thank you for the reminder Joe. My digest message does not include a full e-mail address: You can reach out at any time to issue-trac...@chromium.org with questions or concerns. Can you kindly please supply this so I can post a question? Thanks, dd On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate & Remove: Third-Party Cookies

t;In Developer Trial" (which feels like the most accurate > right now?) > > Thanks! > > Johann > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 16:10 David Dabbs wrote: > >> This morning's Implementation status change to *Deprecated* results in >> >> Dep

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate & Remove: Third-Party Cookies

This morning's Implementation status change to *Deprecated* results in Deprecate Third-Party Cookies (Deprecated) Did you intend to also rename the feature to "Third-Party Cookies?" Thanks On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 4:20:47 AM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Labeling

Per that document, Mode B Chrome instances will also be labeled. On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 2:52:33 PM UTC-5 wande...@chromium.org wrote: > FYI, the specific labels to be sent are listed here: > > https://developer.chrome.com/en/docs/privacy-sandbox/chrome-testing/#mode-a > > Specifically,

Re: [blink-dev] IP Protection feature status

the scope and progress. David On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 7:00 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi David, > > I just set it to "In Development". > > thanks, > Mike > On 9/8/23 8:50 PM, David Dabbs wrote: > > Hello. > > IP Protection feature <https://chromestatus.c

[blink-dev] IP Protection feature status

Hello. IP Protection feature card indicates *No active development*. But there are issues underway, some requesting merge into M118 as "part of the