Re: [chromium-dev] Re: [blink-dev] Inactive OWNERS cleanup

t;>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My personal opinion is that owners who made no contributions >>>>>>> globally in the past 6 months *or* owners who made no contribution to >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> directo

Re: [chromium-dev] Re: [blink-dev] Inactive OWNERS cleanup

> Having your name on OWNERS is an award for your previous amazing contributions I'm concerned that being in OWNERS is regarded as a reward, and being removed as a penalty -- it is part of the problem with cleaning up inactive OWNERS. I'd much prefer to have a separate "amazing contributors" file t

[blink-dev] Intent to continue experimenting: Digital Goods API v2 (M100, Android)

Due to a newly-found crash in WebView, we have had to disable the DGAPI on M100 Android. The API was previously shipping on M100 (intent to ship thread ), and it's too late to fix the crash with a more significant change, as M100

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

Thanks! On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 00:28, Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 4:24 PM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> We are now shipping this API in M100 >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2pjQ3O2GzDA/m/5ukAfzmwAwAJ>, >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

-05-22, without changing the end milestone? This should allow time for M100 to roll out before the OT is disabled. Thanks On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 05:45, Glen Robertson wrote: > Thanks! > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 16:30, Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> That's great to hear! >> LG

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Extend Experiment: Digital Goods API

This is an intent to extend "Digital Goods API v2.0" not "Digital Goods API" (they are separate experiments). On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 19:32, Rouslan Solomakhin wrote: > Hello blink-dev, > > We would like to extend the experiment by two milestones to end in M101 > (inclusively), instead of the cur

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Continue Experimenting: Handwriting Recognition API

As discussed in an earlier thread ( https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/OXnXteNYQQQ/m/RezhfPeYCAAJ) we have only received OT feedback from 1 developer, but it has been positive. There is also some feedback as issues on github ( https://github.com/WICG/handwriting-recognition/issu

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Handwriting Recognition API

Given that the Handwriting Recognition OT ends with M97, and M98 branches today, it seems like it will be difficult to ship in M98 - a merge request to enable the feature is unlikely to be approved. Blink Owners: Would it be acceptable to extend the OT for 1 additional milestone (end in M98) and s

Re: [blink-dev] Question about Shipping vs Continue Experimenting

> What's the reason for the lack of sign-ups? I suspect it's just because it's quite a specialised API and the OT is only available on CrOS. We've had a few developers express interest on the github repo . There also seemed to be some inter

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Continue Experimenting: Digital Goods API

Thanks! On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 16:41, Chris Harrelson wrote: > I think it's fine to extend the date of the v1 API OT, targeted only at > M95 and below. LGTM for that! > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:40 PM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> Hi Blink Owners, >> &g

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Continue Experimenting: Digital Goods API

gt; Trial, it's outside the bounds of approval via one LGTM, and requires >> three. So please wait for two more LGTMs. >> >> LGTM1 to extend this trial to M96. >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:32 PM Glen Robertson >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Bli

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

Thanks! On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 16:30, Yoav Weiss wrote: > That's great to hear! > LGTM to experiment M96-M99 (inclusive) > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:29 AM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> We now intend to disable cross-origin usage of the DGAPI along with the &g

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

This is being tracked on https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1257010 On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 16:28, Glen Robertson wrote: > We now intend to disable cross-origin usage of the DGAPI along with the > v2.0 OT (I'm working on a CL, still needs to be landed and me

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

15, 2021 at 8:48 AM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> Actually, we could disable cross-origin usage and measure attempted usage >> at the same time (in M96 with merge, in time for v2.0 OT start). >> Sounds like this would be preferred by Blink Owners? I'll check with >&g

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

Actually, we could disable cross-origin usage and measure attempted usage at the same time (in M96 with merge, in time for v2.0 OT start). Sounds like this would be preferred by Blink Owners? I'll check with others on the team. On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 10:02, Glen Robertson wrote: > Prob

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

that this isn't a change from the v1 API. On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 19:40, Yoav Weiss wrote: > Is it possible to disallow delegation for the OT as well? > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:46 AM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> Yes, we are planning to disallow delegation before sh

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

learning that this is an issue when > trying to ship. > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:03 PM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> In Chrome, the feature is controlled by the "payment" feature policy, and >> is therefore unavailable except in top-level cont

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

> contexts, or what? > > On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:37:18 AM UTC-4 Glen Robertson wrote: > >> >> Contact emails >> >> >> *mgi...@chromium.org, gle...@chromium.org, rou...@chromium.org*Explainer >> >> >> *https://github.com/WICG

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

Contact emails *mgi...@chromium.org , glen...@chromium.org , rous...@chromium.org * Explainer *https://github.com/WICG/digital-goods/blob/master/explainer.md * Specification *None yet. Have a spec mentor and aiming to do this by

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Continue Experimenting: Digital Goods API

Hi Blink Owners, Have you had a chance to consider this yet? We are quickly approaching the end date of the current OT (2021-09-14). On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 14:56, Glen Robertson wrote: > Would it be possible for us to extend by 2 milestones to M95 (inclusive) > instead? We believe we can

Re: [blink-dev] Change default Origin Trial assumption?

best approach would be to convince those first-party or partner developers to express more public support or feedback? On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 23:51, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 3:53 AM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> Hmm, in my (admittedly very limited

Re: [blink-dev] Change default Origin Trial assumption?

xpected by default", but is more "we need to make sure we got feedback on > the API". > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 4:35 AM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> Not required, but certainly preferred/expected. I was thinking of the >> comments on the recent note_ta

Re: [blink-dev] Change default Origin Trial assumption?

examples to the contrary, where an OT was required by default? > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:05 AM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Right now the default assumption in "Should you run an origin trial? >> <https://www.chromium.org/blink/origin-trial

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Continue Experimenting: Digital Goods API

pose, and a change to v2 is a strong signal that there was > experimental feedback justifying it. Further, a breaking v2 API would > reduce burn-in risk. > > Thanks, > Chris, on behalf of the API owners > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:17 AM Glen Robertson > wrote: > >>

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Digital Goods API

:11 AM 'Ashley Gullen' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Have Microsoft been consulted about integrating this with the Microsoft >> Store? You can list PWAs there and it seems like a natural fit. >> >> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 03:51, Glen

[blink-dev] Change default Origin Trial assumption?

Hi, Right now the default assumption in "Should you run an origin trial? " seems to be that an OT is not run when adding a feature, unless the feature meets particular criteria. This doesn't s

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Note taking new note URL

articular API given >>> the way that its web-exposed surface is really all about spelling. I'm also >>> a little concerned that an OT would be non-trivial to implement, given the >>> fact that we'll be well outside of any particular document context at the &g