Thank you all!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 9:51 AM Mike Taylor wrote:
> So the idea is to add `position-area` in M129, and deprecate (but not yet
>>> remove) `inset-area` also in M129. And then ideally remove `inset-area` in
>>> M131. Two milestones seems like enough time for developers to migrate,
LGTM3
On 7/11/24 12:13 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote:
LGTM2
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 9:12 AM Vladimir Levin
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:52 AM Mason Freed
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM Vladimir Levin
wrote:
From the other emails, there
LGTM2
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 9:12 AM Vladimir Levin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:52 AM Mason Freed wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM Vladimir Levin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From the other emails, there is a 0.02% usage of this property right
>>> now, so it may be
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:52 AM Mason Freed wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM Vladimir Levin
> wrote:
>
>> From the other emails, there is a 0.02% usage of this property right now,
>> so it may be worthwhile to document the planned timeline for the
>> rename process.
>>
>> This
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM Vladimir Levin wrote:
> From the other emails, there is a 0.02% usage of this property right now,
> so it may be worthwhile to document the planned timeline for the
> rename process.
>
> This lists M131 as the shipping milestone, but I assume we want to do this
>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:10 PM 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
> Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org
>
> ExplainerNone
>
> Specification
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10209#issuecomment-2221005001
>
> Summary
>
> The CSSWG resolved to rename the
Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specification
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10209#issuecomment-2221005001
Summary
The CSSWG resolved to rename the `inset-area` property to `position-area`.
See the CSSWG discussion here:
