Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Referrer Policy for Attributionsrc Requests

LGTM3 On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 6:32 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 (and yes, please don't emit other info in future intents - it really > helps with reviews!) > On 5/20/24 1:19 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > LGTM1. > > This looks like a small, well-considered change that makes the platform >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Referrer Policy for Attributionsrc Requests

LGTM2 (and yes, please don't emit other info in future intents - it really helps with reviews!) On 5/20/24 1:19 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1. This looks like a small, well-considered change that makes the platform more consistent. I agree the compat risks are small. From what I

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Referrer Policy for Attributionsrc Requests

LGTM1. This looks like a small, well-considered change that makes the platform more consistent. I agree the compat risks are small. >From what I understand, fields like TAG review and standards-positions for other browsers should be covered by the larger umbrella feature, so we shouldn't block

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Referrer Policy for Attributionsrc Requests

Contact emails akashna...@google.com, lin...@chromium.org, johni...@chromium.org Explainer Attribution Reporting with event-level reports Attribution Reporting API with Aggregatable Reports