Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS overlay property

LGTM3 Joey, can make sure to respond on https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/829 as well? I don't think the feedback necessitates changes, but it would be great to make it clear on the issue. On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 5:59 PM Mike West wrote: > I agree that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS overlay property

I agree that https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429 which the TAG pointed to seems tangential to `overlay`. It's somewhat unfortunate, though, that we don't seem to have responded to their feedback in the month since they gave it. The conversation in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS overlay property

Looking over the discussion that's happened over the past month it seems some confusion has been resolved and some improvements made to the spec. I don't see evidence of outstanding concrete points of disagreement. That, of course, doesn't mean others feel it's ready to ship (would be nice to see

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS overlay property

The CSSWG issue hasn't received any actionable feedback yet, and the TAG feedback wasn't about overlay but about @initial and display animation. On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 7:50 AM Rick Byers wrote: > Hi Joey, > I'm excited for this to ship. I see that there's some feedback from the > TAG

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS overlay property

Hi Joey, I'm excited for this to ship. I see that there's some feedback from the TAG and concern from the WG about at least one open spec issue. Please let us know here when you feel that either

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS overlay property

Contact emailsfuth...@chromium.org, mas...@chromium.org, jar...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/chrishtr/rendering/blob/master/entry-exit-animations.md Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-position-4/#overlay Summary Introduce a overlay property to allow authors to keep elements