Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

Unfortunately there is an ongoing discussion about the behavior in uncomposed documents and even concerns with the previous `` showPicker method being inconsistent across engines which is sadly holding up the PR being merged. I don't believe there's anything within my power to help move that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

Just as an fyi I'm still waiting on the HTML PR to get merged. Don't think there's any blockers. Will update this thread if I end up missing the release window for 121. On Wednesday, 11 October 2023 at 15:37:44 UTC+1 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: > LGTM3 once the PR lands :) > > On Wednesday,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

LGTM3 once the PR lands :) On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:06:35 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2, same condition. > On 10/11/23 7:16 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > LGTM1 (dependent on the PR landing) > > Looks like the spec text is more or less complete with no remaining > possible

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

LGTM2, same condition. On 10/11/23 7:16 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 (dependent on the PR landing) Looks like the spec text is more or less complete with no remaining possible showstoppers. I do find it both amusing and a bit Kafkaesque that the web community seems to have a process

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

LGTM1 (dependent on the PR landing) Looks like the spec text is more or less complete with no remaining possible showstoppers. I do find it both amusing and a bit Kafkaesque that the web community seems to have a process where the spec waits for implementers and implementers (at least us)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 9:47:02 AM UTC-7 Luke wrote: That makes perfect sense. For now I've removed the target milestones all together (they were rather arbitrary). But targeting 120 or 121 seems like a good idea. As for merging the spec change I think it should be ready to go assuming

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

That makes perfect sense. For now I've removed the target milestones all together (they were rather arbitrary). But targeting 120 or 121 seems like a good idea. As for merging the spec change I think it should be ready to go assuming my response on the PR satisfies the question you had?

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

I'm generally supportive of adding showPicker to select elements - it's a handy API for developers and it avoids some JS hacks. I do think we should a) land the spec changes , and b) allow some developer test time, before we ship this API. There were

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 14:43:23 UTC+1 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:40 AM Luke wrote: Contact emails lukewa...@gmail.com, lu...@warlow.dev Explainer https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9754 Thanks for the explainer! :) What's preventing us from landing the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:40 AM Luke wrote: > Contact emails > lukewarlow...@gmail.com, l...@warlow.dev > > Explainer > https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9754 > Thanks for the explainer! :) What's preventing us from landing the PR? +Chris Harrelson - Can we mark Chromium as positive for

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

Contact emails lukewarlow...@gmail.com, l...@warlow.dev Explainer https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9754 Specification https://whatpr.org/html/9754/input.html#dom-select-showpicker Summary Developers have been asking for a way to programmatically open the option picker of a select element.