LGTM3
On 18/01/2024 02:26, Mike Taylor wrote:
LGTM2
On 1/17/24 7:45 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote:
LGTM1 (as noted in the other intent, tests are needed but we aren't
blocking approval on them in this case)
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:02 AM Corentin Wallez
wrote:
Hey Rick,
The spec
LGTM2
On 1/17/24 7:45 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote:
LGTM1 (as noted in the other intent, tests are needed but we aren't
blocking approval on them in this case)
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:02 AM Corentin Wallez
wrote:
Hey Rick,
The spec PRs for all of these intents are landed but
LGTM1 (as noted in the other intent, tests are needed but we aren't
blocking approval on them in this case)
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:02 AM Corentin Wallez
wrote:
> Hey Rick,
>
> The spec PRs for all of these intents are landed but you're correct that
> all the tests are. Tests aren't blocked,
Hey Rick,
The spec PRs for all of these intents are landed but you're correct that
all the tests are. Tests aren't blocked, they just need someone to get to
it (myself for this particular feature) and we won't turn the feature on
until they are finished. I didn't realize that LGTMs waited on
Hi Corentin,
This looks minor and probably pretty easy. But we do normally like to see
spec PRs and tests land (or have a discussion around why they're blocked)
before approving. Thoughts?
Rick
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:18 AM Corentin Wallez wrote:
> Contact emailscwal...@google.com
>
>
Contact emailscwal...@google.com
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/4331
Summary
Functionality added to the WebGPU/WGSL spec after its first shipment in a
browser. Loosens a restriction where using readonly depth-stencil
attachments in a render pass required both
