Re: [blink-dev] Intent to remove: prefetch-src

2023-02-08 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM3 /Daniel On 2023-02-08 17:39, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 4:48 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 - as potential breakage won't be user visible and would be mitigated by other means. On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 11:21 AM Mike West wrote: LGTM0 (I'm

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to remove: prefetch-src

2023-02-08 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM2 On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 4:48 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 - as potential breakage won't be user visible and would be mitigated > by other means. > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 11:21 AM Mike West wrote: > >> LGTM0 (I'm recused, as this has my name on it). >> >> For a little more color, we

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to remove: prefetch-src

2023-02-08 Thread Yoav Weiss
LGTM1 - as potential breakage won't be user visible and would be mitigated by other means. On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 11:21 AM Mike West wrote: > LGTM0 (I'm recused, as this has my name on it). > > For a little more color, we accidentally shipped `prefetch-src` in M92 > when moving CSP parsing out

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to remove: prefetch-src

2023-02-08 Thread Mike West
LGTM0 (I'm recused, as this has my name on it). For a little more color, we accidentally shipped `prefetch-src` in M92 when moving CSP parsing out of the renderer. The check in

[blink-dev] Intent to remove: prefetch-src

2023-02-08 Thread Noam Rosenthal
(sending this again, previous email was lacking template & details) Primary eng (and PM) emails nrosent...@chromium.org mk...@chromium.org Summary Prefetch-src was never fully adopted, but was shipped by mistake in 2021 (the flag was removed, Oops) We’ve since changed the spec, and the