Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

What is the point of this throttling given the workarounds (postMessage?) or maybe postMessage is going to be throttled? I've used this to make something that takes a long time not freeze the browser const wait = _ => new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve)); for (many-operations) {

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:46 PM Etienne Pierre-doray wrote: > Did the experimentation show any positive or negative impact on real-life >> content? >> > On windows, the only significant impact we saw in the field is a > regression on Input Delay (Page Load), 5.20% at 95th %ile. No improvement >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

> > Did the experimentation show any positive or negative impact on real-life > content? > On windows, the only significant impact we saw in the field is a regression on Input Delay (Page Load), 5.20% at 95th %ile. No improvement otherwise, so I don't see any benefits of going forward with this

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

Did the experimentation show any positive or negative impact on real-life content? On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18 PM François Doray wrote: > The change to the nesting level at which 4ms clamping kicks in > (MaxUnthrottledTimeoutNestingLevel) never shipped, because Speedometer 2.1 > is not

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

The change to the nesting level at which 4ms clamping kicks in (MaxUnthrottledTimeoutNestingLevel) never shipped, because Speedometer 2.1 is not affected by it like Speedometer 2.0 was. However, WebKit did implement this change:

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

Hi all, I'm sharing an update with results of the experiments over 21 days on Chrome Beta M102. The results below are mostly small percentages changes, and the finch guidelines

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:41 AM Etienne Pierre-doray wrote: > Thanks! >> >> What's the plan for finding sites this breaks? Monitor bug reports? Or is >> there something more proactive we could do? >> > I'm thinking about bug reports and guardian metrics. shaseley@ might have > additional

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

Thanks! > > What's the plan for finding sites this breaks? Monitor bug reports? Or is > there something more proactive we could do? > I'm thinking about bug reports and guardian metrics. shaseley@ might have additional insight from running a similar experiment crbug.com/1263190 On Wed, Mar 30,

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

LGTM to experiment M101-102 inclusive Thanks for working on this!! What's the plan for finding sites this breaks? Monitor bug reports? Or is there something more proactive we could do? On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 9:36:30 PM UTC+2 Etienne Pierre-doray wrote: > Contact