Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: allow anchor-size() in inset and margin Properties

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 8:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wednesday, October 23, 2024 at 8:10:45 AM UTC-7 Vladimir Levin wrote: > > LGTM1. I think this is a straightforward improvement to the feature set. > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 3:34 PM Rune L

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: allow anchor-size() in inset and margin Properties

LGTM2 On Wednesday, October 23, 2024 at 8:10:45 AM UTC-7 Vladimir Levin wrote: LGTM1. I think this is a straightforward improvement to the feature set. On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 3:34 PM Rune Lillesveen wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:30 PM Alex Russell wrote: Hey Rune, It's surprising tha

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: allow anchor-size() in inset and margin Properties

LGTM1. I think this is a straightforward improvement to the feature set. On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 3:34 PM Rune Lillesveen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:30 PM Alex Russell > wrote: > >> Hey Rune, >> >> It's surprising that there aren't any developer signals given that we're >> going first an

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: allow anchor-size() in inset and margin Properties

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:30 PM Alex Russell wrote: > Hey Rune, > > It's surprising that there aren't any developer signals given that we're > going first and there are no signals from other vendors and that there's no > explainer with a compelling code example that shows how this solves an > imp

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: allow anchor-size() in inset and margin Properties

Hey Rune, It's surprising that there aren't any developer signals given that we're going first and there are no signals from other vendors and that there's no explainer with a compelling code example that shows how this solves an important problem (although I think I can imagine what it is). Ca

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

LGTM3 On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 7:08 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2024-07-03 13:53, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:50 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < >> yoavwe...@chromium.org> w

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2024-07-03 13:53, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:50 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 10:47:21 AM UTC+2 Anders Hartvoll Ruud wro

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

LGTM1 On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:50 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < > yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 10:47:21 AM UTC+2 Anders Hartvoll Ruud >> wrote: >> >> Contact emailsandr...@chromium.org >> >> Exp

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 10:47:21 AM UTC+2 Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > > Contact emailsandr...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#positio

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 10:47:21 AM UTC+2 Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: Contact emailsandr...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position- try-fallbacks Summary Replaces the inset-area() function with inset-area values directly within

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

On Thursday, April 11, 2024 at 7:58:18 PM UTC-7 dan...@microsoft.com wrote: I'm really excited to see this move forward! Thanks! Me too - exciting after about 4 years of working on it, right? Thanks for all of the help on this, especially early on. For the TAG review

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

I'm really excited to see this move forward! For the TAG review , it's not clear to me that they've had a chance to re-review yet since the last substantial updates. I'm not suggesting that we delay shipping at this stage, but maybe worth sen