Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

Noting this here for future discoverability: one of the APIs that was launched as part of this was a new name for hasStorageAccess : hasUnpartitionedCookieAccess

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

LGTM3 On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:30 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2024-03-20 16:14, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM1 > > The signals from other vendors and the CG discussion seem encouraging and > I agree that the future risk from an "all" value is probably outweighed

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2024-03-20 16:14, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 The signals from other vendors and the CG discussion seem encouraging and I agree that the future risk from an "all" value is probably outweighed by its developer-facing benefits. On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:56 PM Ari

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

LGTM1 The signals from other vendors and the CG discussion seem encouraging and I agree that the future risk from an "all" value is probably outweighed by its developer-facing benefits. On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:56 PM Ari Chivukula wrote: > I'd guess that, in the future, the semantics around

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

I'd guess that, in the future, the semantics around 'all' may change in one of two ways: (A) If storage methods included are deprecated, (1) we would start warning developers via a DevTools issue when they use 'all', (2) we would start requiring the deprecated method was specifically included in

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Ari Chivukula wrote: > I think the last place it came up was in this thread: > https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/898#issuecomment-1745688352 > > I think it came up at TPAC, but I might me missing the right line: >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

I think the last place it came up was in this thread: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/898#issuecomment-1745688352 I think it came up at TPAC, but I might me missing the right line:

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

On Thursday, March 14, 2024 at 2:27:20 PM UTC+1 Ari Chivukula wrote: Contact emails aric...@chromium.org, wanderv...@chromium.org, johann...@chromium.org, rosh...@google.com Specification https://privacycg.github.io/saa-non-cookie-storage/ Design Doc