Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

2023-07-28 Thread Joey Arhar
Here is a compat issue that was filed: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1439802 I did some further compat investigation which Rob summarized here: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8857#issue-1717746858 On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:36 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Thanks

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

2023-07-28 Thread Mike Taylor
Thanks for the heads up. Mind sharing some links to the compat issues? On 7/27/23 8:57 PM, Joey Arhar wrote: FYI: due to compat issues I encountered while launching this feature, we decided to create a CSS property to opt-in to the new behavior. It was resolved by the CSSWG here:

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

2023-07-27 Thread Joey Arhar
FYI: due to compat issues I encountered while launching this feature, we decided to create a CSS property to opt-in to the new behavior. It was resolved by the CSSWG here: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8857 On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 8:49 AM Rick Byers wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Wed, Apr 5,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

2023-04-05 Thread Rick Byers
LGTM3 On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 11:40 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-04-05 17:39, Alex Russell wrote: > > Thanks everyone for adding an Explainer, etc. I'm a little worried that > this is another feature that skimped on developer engagement (Explainers) > and review (TAG)

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

2023-04-05 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-04-05 17:39, Alex Russell wrote: Thanks everyone for adding an Explainer, etc. I'm a little worried that this is another feature that skimped on developer engagement (Explainers) and review (TAG) until I2S. They both came very late, and if the feature itself wasn't

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

2023-04-05 Thread Alex Russell
Thanks everyone for adding an Explainer, etc. I'm a little worried that this is another feature that skimped on developer engagement (Explainers) and review (TAG) until I2S. They both came very late, and if the feature itself wasn't seemingly landed as a closed spec PR, I'd be blocking this

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

2023-03-22 Thread Rick Byers
We discussed this in the API owners meeting today. Since position requests were just filed, we'd like to give this another week to see if anyone has any feedback. But otherwise we're excited to see this ship. Rick On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:10 PM Joey Arhar wrote: > TAG review:

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Transitions on specified discrete properties

2023-03-15 Thread Joey Arhar
TAG review: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/825 WebKit standards position: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/148 Mozilla standards position: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/763 On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:30 PM Joey Arhar wrote: > Contact