Thank you!
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:20 PM Chris Harrelson
wrote:
> Sounds fine to me - consider it renumbered from 124.
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 1:13 PM 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev <
> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello Blink owners,
>>
>> We are asking that the OT period on this experim
Sounds fine to me - consider it renumbered from 124.
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 1:13 PM 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hello Blink owners,
>
> We are asking that the OT period on this experiment be shifted, and
> instead of the originally requested period of m122-m127 (i
Hello Blink owners,
We are asking that the OT period on this experiment be shifted, and instead
of the originally requested period of m122-m127 (inclusive), we consider it
retroactively as m124-m129 (inclusive).
As of the time of writing, there has only ever been one active OT
participant (M
Oops, missed Chris' email on this. But you're double approved now. :)
On 1/17/24 8:32 PM, Mike Taylor wrote:
LGTM to experiment from M122 to M127 inclusive.
On 1/17/24 9:09 AM, 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev wrote:
A quick clarification, btw, that we have a partner in mind that's
eager to start or
LGTM to experiment from M122 to M127 inclusive.
On 1/17/24 9:09 AM, 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev wrote:
A quick clarification, btw, that we have a partner in mind that's
eager to start origin trial as soon as m122.
We also heard interest from other parties during Screen Capture CG
meetings.
On W
LGTM to experiment M122 - M127
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 6:09 AM 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
> A quick clarification, btw, that we have a partner in mind that's eager to
> start origin trial as soon as m122.
> We also heard interest from other parties during Screen Ca
