Re: living in the console.

>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The best part of this mode of operation is that all linux >>>>>>>> consoles feel the same. Regardless whether they are on my local >>>>>>>> box, on my Panix shell account, or on

Re: living in the console.

blinux-list@redhat.com> > > To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> > > Subject: Re: living in the console. > > > > Hmm, yeah, that's cool once you have things installed. I'm > > talking about the general installing of dos to start

re: living in the console

Actually I agree with Karen, even though I have been in Linux since 2003, but subscribing to shell accounts since 1995. Sure Linux is powerful and because its case sensative you can have practicly unlimited amount of file names. My problems are ways which man-pages are written. They really

re: living in the console

While I can agree that freedos might be a poor choice, I do not share your thought that Dos and Linux console are the same environment. Speaking only for myself, at least as I have managed to experience things in such a limited way, often it takes three Linux programs to do the work of one DOS

Re: living in the console

Oh, I have experienced on both environments and I can tell you that BASH is way more powerful than any version of DOS, and the same is true for just about any shell I have ever heard of. But they are equivalent in the sense that they are both accessible and in the case of Linux shell, worth

Re: living in the console.

ist@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. Yoshio here. I typed "jaws for dos" as a search term at https://duckduckgo.com and found: http://allinaccess.com/happ/ click on the "local mirror" link, whic

re: living in the console

Mark Peveto here, I think i'm gonna put my dos project on hold for now, and concentrate on learning the linux console as best I can. It's not much different than the dos environment, so we'll see how I go there. Seems free dos is a bad choice, and I can't find anything else to use at the

Re: living in the console.

st@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. I am not. since none of the Linux speech sources currently support my synthesizer, it is not like I can just buy a system. That means having one built and configured locally..som

Re: living in the console.

ifting including mplayer, lynx, ssh > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > remote accounts etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The best part of this mode of operation is that all linux >

Re: living in the console.

shell account, or on a remote work server. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And as was pointed out, I can control all the speech controls > > > > > > > > from my main keyboard. > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: living in the console.

emulation of vocaleyes may work. On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:52:31 From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the

Re: living in the console.

l all the speech controls > > > > > > > from my main keyboard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:02:42PM -0400, Linux for blind general > > > &g

Re: living in the console.

. On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:03:36 From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. I am not. since none

Re: living in the console.

.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. which is why I am going to find one on line somewhere. I have no actual Linux box myself. Kare On Wed, 31 May 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Oh I think there is

Re: living in the console.

able and a > > > > > > program like kermit or commo on the dos machine to connect to > > > > > > the other computer running linux and have all console output > > > > > > redirected out the linux serial port to the dos box. I did > >

Re: living in the console.

Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. I am not. since none of the Linux speech sources currently support my synthesizer, it is not like I can just buy a system. That means having one built and configured locally..something I did not

Re: living in the console.

edhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. I am not. since none of the Linux speech sources currently support my synthesizer, it is not like I can just buy a system. That means having one built and configured locally..something I did not think would be such an issue. I mean I do it regul

Re: living in the console.

1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:03:36 > > > > From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> > > > > To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> &g

Re: living in the console.

s machine to connect to > > > > the other computer running linux and have all console output > > > > redirected out the linux serial port to the dos box. I did > > > > this once with only one version of linux and the information on > > > > how to d

Re: living in the console.

l port to the dos box. I did > > > this once with only one version of linux and the information on > > > how to do that is in one of linux-howtos serial howto files. > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > > > > >

Re: living in the console.

nformation on how to do > > that is in one of linux-howtos serial howto files. > > > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:03:36 > > > From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list

Re: living in the console.

edhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. I am not. since none of the Linux speech sources currently support my synthesizer, it is not like I can just buy a system. That means having one built and configured locally..something I did not think would be such an issue. I mean I do it regul

Re: living in the console.

f linux-howtos serial howto files. > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:03:36 > > From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> > > To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinu

Re: living in the console.

<blinux-list@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. But why would that be needful when one can connect to the Linux box with ssh telnet? On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: >

Re: living in the console.

inux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. But why would that be needful when one can connect to the Linux box with ssh telnet? On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: If two local computers are available with one running dos and a compatible screen reade

Re: living in the console.

wrote: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:03:36 From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. I am not. since none of the Linux speech sources currently support my

Re: living in the console.

From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. I am not. since none of the Linux speech sources currently support my synthesizer, it is not like I can just

Re: living in the console.

but that work is in progress. On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:03:36 From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the co

Re: living in the console.

nux-list@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. which is why I am going to find one on line somewhere. I have no actual Linux box myself. Kare On Wed, 31 May 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: &

Re: living in the console.

ussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: living in the console. which is why I am going to find one on line somewhere. I have no actual Linux box myself. Kare On Wed, 31 May 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Oh I think there is a file somewhere called setup.exe or ed

Re: living in the console.

From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: living in the console. Oh I think there is a file somewhere called setup.exe or edbrowse-setup or something like that. Sorry it has been many years since I did the setup. The readm

Re: living in the console.

which is why I am going to find one on line somewhere. I have no actual Linux box myself. Kare On Wed, 31 May 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Oh I think there is a file somewhere called setup.exe or edbrowse-setup or something like that. Sorry it has been many years since I

Re: living in the console.

If you mean to browse something just type: edbrowse url or edbrowse file Then you can use the same commands as ed. edbrowse is also an email reader/sender and other stuff. I love it. On May 30, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Out of

Re: living in the console.

Out of curiosity, what is the syntax for ebrowse? We have it here at shellworld...I think, and I wish to test something. Karen On Fri, 26 May 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Edbrowse may help for web browsing alonggg with surfraw-heavy. Sent from BlueMail for iPhone On May

Re: living in the console.

Thanks, I've added it! -tim On May 26, 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > Nice list of applications. I'd like to offer > an addition for music recording and editing: Nama. ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com

Re: living in the console.

Hi Tim, Nice list of applications. I'd like to offer an addition for music recording and editing: Nama. https://freeshell.de/~bolangi/cgi1/nama.cgi/00home.html https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/Audio-Nama/script/nama FYI, Nama uses Ecasound as the audio processing backend, and takes care

Re: living in the console.

Edbrowse may help for web browsing alonggg with surfraw-heavy. Sent from BlueMail for iPhone On May 25, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: Tim here Mark Peveto wrote Over the last couple days or so, I've considered becoming a totally command

Re: living in the console.

1. I use the tools in the cups-bsd package for printing. "lpr " 2. For music, I've ripped all of my CDs and I play them with mplayer or mpg321. 3. For documents, I create them in latex and convert them to pdf via pdflatex before sending them to others. On 05/25/2017 05:29 PM, Linux for

living in the console.

Mark Peveto here. Over the last couple days or so, I've considered becoming a totally command line linux user. I know there are those who've done it, but i simply have not known how. Now that I'm trafficing in hardware synths that don't work in the GUI, that desire has increased. How would I