On May 8, 2011, at 8:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Is there a standard for renaming fe80:: addresses to represent they are
> interfacing with different vlans?
well, yes. Link-local addresses (FE80::/10) areas you say interpreted only in
the LAN in question. The usual approach is to give the LAN a
On 2011-5-6, at 21:18, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> On 6 May, 2011, at 9:14 pm, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> I am curious as to what the correct behavior here should be for encapsulated
>> (6in4, 6to4, teredo) packets, and if this functionality was also borked. I
>> was under the impression that for encaps
Hi Dave,
On 09.05.2011 05:26, Dave Taht wrote:
> I am modestly stumped as to how to solve this properly. I think it's
> been causing problems with ipv6 for a long time, but I could be wrong.
>
> see http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/126
>
> Basically although the underlying interfaces do have un
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2011, at 8:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> > Is there a standard for renaming fe80:: addresses to represent they are
> interfacing with different vlans?
>
> well, yes. Link-local addresses (FE80::/10) areas you say interpreted only
> in
On May 9, 2011, at 7:59 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2011, at 8:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> > Is there a standard for renaming fe80:: addresses to represent they are
>> > interfacing with different vlans?
>>
>> well, yes. Link-local addr
Fred/all
See
http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/126
which has a ip -6 addr and ifconfig dump
and see if that "seems right" to you.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2011, at 7:59 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> >
> >
BTW, every time I post nowadays, I get moderated on bismark-devel. Do you think
you could grandfather bloat@ emails?
On May 9, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Fred/all
>
> See
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/126
>
> which has a ip -6 addr and ifconfig dump
>
> and see if that "see
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 14:42 +0200, Richard Scheffenegger wrote:
> I'm not an expert in TSO / GSO, and NIC driver design, but what I gathered
> is, that with these schemes, and mordern NICs that do scatter/gather DMA of
> dotzends of "independent" header/data chuncks directly from memory, the NIC
There's a new qdisc on the block. Here's some documentation on how it works.
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Fastabend
Date: Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: trying to wrap my head around mqprio
To: Dave Taht
On 5/8/2011 12:49 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I just finished
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> BTW, every time I post nowadays, I get moderated on bismark-devel. Do you
> think you could grandfather bloat@ emails?
>
>
I've added you to the bismark-devel list and set nomail on.
> On May 9, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> Fred/all
10 matches
Mail list logo