On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 01:59:04PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> I wouldn't bother with that either. 120 Mbit/s is the highest rate you
> can get in Europe as far as I can tell, so being able to push 80 Mbit/s
> on a four year old router is fine (as long as you're careful to avoid
> shaping t
> > Perhaps you should push your system to OpenWRT?
> There is still some work going on to streamline the gui.
Fair enough. That's important.
> there are less features in the aqm-scripts for prioritizing packet
> types than qos-scripts.
I wouldn't bother much with that. The promise of fq_code
Hi Dave,
On Dec 6, 2013, at 19:15 , Dave Taht wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>>> I note that openwrt's qos-scripts still do not do ipv6 properly, and I think
>>> cerowrt's aqm system is better in most respects, and it's easy to
>>> include on an openwrt sy