Jim Gettys wrote
> Personally, I've mostly been interested in QOS in the local network: as
> "hints", for example, that it is worth more aggressive bidding for transmit
> opportunities in WiFi, for example to ensure my VOIP, teleconferencing,
> gaming, music playing and other actually real time pa
I agree with you Jim about being careful with QoS. That's why Andrew Odlyzko
proposed the experiment with exactly two classes, and proposed it as an
*experiment*. So many researchers and IETF members seem to think we should just
turn on diffserv and everything will work great... I've seen very
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:52 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2014 16:32:55 -0400, dpr...@reed.com said:
>
> > And in the end of the day, the problem is congestion, which is very
> > non-linear. There is almost no congestion at almost all places in the
> Internet
> > at any particular time. You can
I'll answer this way... The endpoints can use information to slow down as early
as possible. That's the whole point of control loop tuning. The fundamental
resonance of a control loop depends on its speed of draining and filling the
storage element.
So you want to sample and deliver ASAP two th
Hi,
I completely agree that this service differentiation was wrong from the
beginning. The idea of using bits to implement a trade-off that doesn't involve
prioritization between users is old (*), and has always been the right approach
in my opinion.
At least one proposal in this direction is
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:03 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>> A side note: It's taken me a long time to finally realize what was
>> wrong with level3's recent blog posting here:
>>
>> http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/observations-internet
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:03 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> A side note: It's taken me a long time to finally realize what was
> wrong with level3's recent blog posting here:
>
> http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/observations-internet-middleman/
>
> The loss chart on the right here that they s