Yes, yes, yes, yes!
Defense in depth is also good. We long ago learned that you don't design any
large scale system without a lot of attention avoiding single-point
catastrophes. One really major example is to achieve content protection with
end-to-end security and authentication based on
I have discovered the source of the confusion. This is different, but
similar to PUMA6 problems, I think.
Certain types of traffic are getting de-prioritized, especially small
packets under load.
Comparison:
Normal ping:
Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 734ms, *Average = 202ms*
Large 1472-byte ping
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:44:28 -0400, Jim Gettys said:
> My solution is more radical: all the vendors should be held to much higher
> standards, including reproducible builds (something that the UK government
> has been trying to get them to do for years, and failed).
All too often, even getting
I share the reproducable builds thing - but for all vendors, including
cisco and openwrt.
Trust but verify.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:44 AM Jim Gettys wrote:
>
> It's worth looking at the UK government oversight report:
>
>
It's worth looking at the UK government oversight report:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/790270/HCSEC_OversightBoardReport-2019.pdf
Not clear that Huawei is worse than other 5g vendors, if our experience
with other embedded system
I'd like to take the time to read this.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/790270/HCSEC_OversightBoardReport-2019.pdf
but I'm putting on a concert at 9.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:32 AM David P. Reed wrote:
>
> Look, the existence
Look, the existence of security flaws in software isn't news. Real news would
be if there were systems discovered to have no flaws at all...
So what does this article really say?
It says that Britain and the US intelligence officials are now going after
Huawei in a new way, because the
The NYTimes has become a mouthpiece for those who want to see China as the new
evil empire. Recent pieces by David Sanger have hyped the idea that the US has
a "5G Gap" and that China (Huawei) will threaten to conquer the world with 5G
superiority, so we should be vigilantly opposing Huawei.
Well, it's a widely placed story in every newspaper.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:16 AM David P. Reed wrote:
>
> The NYTimes has become a mouthpiece for those who want to see China as the
> new evil empire. Recent pieces by David Sanger have hyped the idea that the
> US has a "5G Gap" and that
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/28/technology/huawei-security-british-report.html
--
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
HI cloneman,
maybe have a look at http://www.dslreports.com/tools/puma6?
> On Mar 28, 2019, at 12:00, cloneman wrote:
>
> I'm getting a weird problem with this new modem , it's Docsis 3.1
>
> latency/jitter measured via ping is about ~300ms during download pressure of
> 3 http transfers. The
see badmodems.com
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:01 AM cloneman wrote:
>
> I'm getting a weird problem with this new modem , it's Docsis 3.1
>
> latency/jitter measured via ping is about ~300ms during download pressure of
> 3 http transfers. The latency doesn't appear on synthetic bufferbloat
>
I'm getting a weird problem with this new modem , it's Docsis 3.1
latency/jitter measured via ping is about ~300ms during download pressure
of 3 http transfers. The latency doesn't appear on synthetic bufferbloat
benchmarks, though. (dslreports ; 20ms ("A")
question: trying to figure out why I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo
