Ah, I see what you mean. Yes, this makes sense as a major concern worth
checking,
thanks for explaining.
-Jake
On 2019-04-11, 17:37, "Jonathan Morton" wrote:
> On 12 Apr, 2019, at 2:56 am, Holland, Jake wrote:
>
> But in practice do you expect link speed changes to be a major
> On 12 Apr, 2019, at 2:56 am, Holland, Jake wrote:
>
> But in practice do you expect link speed changes to be a major issue?
For wireline, consider ADSL2+. Maximum downstream link speed is 24Mbps,
impaired somewhat by ATM framing but let's ignore that for now. A basic
"poverty package"
On 2019-04-11, 11:29, "Jonathan Morton" wrote:
> A question I would ask, though, is whether that 10ms automatically scales to
> the actual link rate, or whether it is pre-calculated for the fastest rate
> and then actually turns into a larger time value when the link rate drops.
> That's a
> On 11 Apr, 2019, at 9:00 pm, Holland, Jake wrote:
>
> MBS = maximum burst size
> PIR = peak information rate
> CBS = committed burst size
> CIR = committed information rate
Ah, this is enough to map the terms onto my prior knowledge of TBFs. (In my
considered opinion, TBFs are obsolete
Defs
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2697
On Thu 11 Apr 2019 at 19:54, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> > On 11 Apr, 2019, at 1:38 pm, Mikael Abrahamsson
> wrote:
> >
> > The mbs defines the MBS for the PIR bucket and the cbs defines the CBS
> for the CIR bucket
>
> What do these lumps of jargon
On 11/04/2019 19:54, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> On 11 Apr, 2019, at 1:38 pm, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>
>> The mbs defines the MBS for the PIR bucket and the cbs defines the CBS for
>> the CIR bucket
>
> What do these lumps of jargon refer to?
If you're truly interested in the answer: the
MBS = maximum burst size
PIR = peak information rate
CBS = committed burst size
CIR = committed information rate
Pages 1185 thru 1222 of the referenced doc* are actually really interesting
reading
and an excellent walk-through of their token bucket concept and how to use it.
Best,
Jake
*
> On 11 Apr, 2019, at 1:38 pm, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> The mbs defines the MBS for the PIR bucket and the cbs defines the CBS for
> the CIR bucket
What do these lumps of jargon refer to?
- Jonathan Morton
___
Bloat mailing list
I just noticed netalyzr shut down last month
On April 11, 2019 2:45:19 PM GMT+02:00, Sebastian Moeller
wrote:
>Interesting! Thanks for sharing. I wonder what the netalyzr buffertest
>would report for these?
>
>Best Regards
>Sebastian
>
>On April 11, 2019 12:38:54 PM GMT+02:00,
My understanding of netduma's implementation of "anti-bufferbloat" is
that it also does weird things with attempting to classify traffic,
and as far as I can tell, they still don't correctly compensate for
dsl or cable modem framing which is the root cause of some angst in
their forums. And I sure
Interesting! Thanks for sharing. I wonder what the netalyzr buffertest would
report for these?
Best Regards
Sebastian
On April 11, 2019 12:38:54 PM GMT+02:00, Mikael Abrahamsson
wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I talked to Nokia (former Alcatel/Lucent equipment) regarding their
>typical buffer
Hi,
I talked to Nokia (former Alcatel/Lucent equipment) regarding their
typical buffer settings on BNG. I thought their answer might be relevant
as a data point for people to have when they do testing:
12 matches
Mail list logo
