Good riddance; most of the current platforms are using Lantiq Wireless
which they got from some acquizition/cross-licence deal and are poorly
documented at worst and completely innoperable.
I doubt this will impact any of their Industrial IO and Edge stuff which is
actually good and anyone sensibl
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 21:26, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>
> This seems all interesting, but isn't this true of any network technology. If
> I use a UDP app with my own style of CC I can just take all the capacity if I
> want.
>
> A solution could be to apply a circuit-breaker/policer in the netw
> On 28 Apr, 2020, at 10:43 pm, Black, David wrote:
>
> And I also noted this at the end of the meeting: “queue protection that
> might apply the disincentive”
>
> That would send cheaters to the L4S conventional queue along with all the
> other queue-building traffic.
Alas, we have not yet
And I also noted this at the end of the meeting: “queue protection that might
apply the disincentive”
That would send cheaters to the L4S conventional queue along with all the other
queue-building traffic.
Thanks, --David
From: tsvwg On Behalf Of Luca Muscariello
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 202
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:57:26 -0700
Dave Taht wrote:
> H/T sebastian:
>
> https://investors.maxlinear.com/press-releases/detail/395/maxlinear-to-acquire-intels-home-gateway-platform
>
> Gawd knows what this means.
>
It means somebody is getting a bonus, and somebody is out of a job
___
The link is that the L queue starves the other queue, and indeed the
envisaged queue protection mechanism
is supposed to react to that behavior by black-listing the misbehaving
sender.
This would be the third coupled component in L4S (the senders, the AQM and
the policer). Which is currently non-ma
Hi Jake,
Thanks for the notes. Very useful.
The other issue with the meeting was that the virtual mic queue control
channel was the WebEx Meeting chat that does not exist in WebEx Teams. So,
I had to switch to Meetings and lost some pieces of the discussion.
Yes there might be a terminology diffe
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Luca,
To your point about the discussion being difficult to follow: I tried to
capture the intent of everyone who commented while taking notes:
https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/notes-ietf-interim-2020-tsvwg-03
I think this was intended to take the place of a need for eve
H/T sebastian:
https://investors.maxlinear.com/press-releases/detail/395/maxlinear-to-acquire-intels-home-gateway-platform
Gawd knows what this means.
--
Make Music, Not War
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729
___
Hi Dave and list members,
It was difficult to follow the discussion at the meeting yesterday.
Who said what in the first place.
There have been a lot of non-technical comments such as: this solution
is better than another in my opinion. "better" has often been used
as when evaluating the taste o
10 matches
Mail list logo
