I've been wanting to set this sort of thing up (the best DSL I can get is 8/1,
and that's with a bondd DSL setup) but have not been able to find a good
tutorial in setting things up.
anyone have any pointers?
David Lang
On Sun, 3 May 2020, Dave Taht wrote:
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 07:33:56 -0
Hmm. Can webrtc set/see the ttl field? dscp? ecn?
I figure it might be able to on linux and osx, but not windows.
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
I sure wish while everyone is stuck at home, that we could upgrade our
routers in place, as well.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/04/frontiers-bankruptcy-reveals-cynical-choice-deny-profitable-fiber-millions
--
Make Music, Not War
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-8
Jan Ceuleers wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> So evidently Viasat doesn't know how to handle bufferbloat at all with
>> their exede satellite service. It's been really bad today. I've
>> attached flent's tcp_1up results for those interested. Note that the
>> base RTT is 600ms and up
turn off cake, do it over wired. :) TAKE a packet cap of before and after.Thx.
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 8:31 AM David P. Reed wrote:
>
> Sergey -
>
>
>
> I am very happy to report that fast.com reports the following from my
> inexpensive Chromebook, over 802.11ac, my Linux-on-Celeron cake entry ro
Sergey -
I am very happy to report that fast.com reports the following from my
inexpensive Chromebook, over 802.11ac, my Linux-on-Celeron cake entry router
setup, through RCN's "Gigabit service". It's a little surprising, only in how
good it is.
460 Mbps down/17 Mbps up, 11 ms. unloaded, 18
Thanks Sebastian. I do agree that in many cases, reflecting the ICMP off the
entry device that has the external IP address for the NAT gets most of the RTT
measure, and if there's no queueing built up in the NAT device, that's a
reasonable measure. But...
However, if the router has "taken up
Already mentioned in other replies, but you can just run SQM on the
separate links and load balance those using mwan3. These are my mwan3 rules
to balance a BVVDSL and DOCSIS connection: https://i.imgur.com/eAd4Bl5.png
Unsticky for ports that can be safely balanced without stickiness (e.g.
steam
I guess the question is, what Rich needs more urgently, more aggregate rate or
more single-flow performance?
Then for bonding one needs a dedicated head-end device on the internet side of
things, while mwan3 on the router alone should work with any independent links
for failover and load sharing
not huge on bonding, simpler to just get the two uplinks and split
flows across them with an sqm instance for each and a tc hash
directing flows at one or another.
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Sterling
wrote:
>
> When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch set t
When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch set to
make multi gateway NAT work and it worked great
http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes
Should be able to use that plus ifb+cake on each NIC to do the right thing, aye?
As an aside, I'm kind of furious that NAT fix never got merged u
Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), I
wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from our ISP
and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router.
I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.
But neither would
12 matches
Mail list logo
