A little politicking: change the name to make the metric actually mean what it 
says.

Turn "Typical packet loss" into "Typical retransmissions".

"Packet loss" is misleading except to a TCP/IP expert.

We recommend reporting reporting what losses cause, retransmissions. Retransmissions are 
meaningful to the consumer, because it tells them what percentage of the packets are 
significantly delayed. Like high latency, retransmissions cause delays, garbling, 
drop-outs and "buffering" messages in both audio and video.

If we have someone there for the Q&A or if someone knows one of the panelists, 
super. In any case, get it to them in writing as a bug report, not a request for 
improvement.

--dave

And the fix is only a few extra characters, and fits in the space on the label


On 3/30/22 11:21, Dave Taht wrote:

Anyone got a presence at this? I'd really like to kill "typical"
packet loss as a metric dead...

https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-announces-second-public-hearing-broadband-consumer-labels



--
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
dave.collier-br...@indexexchange.com<mailto:dave.collier-br...@indexexchange.com>
 |              -- Mark Twain


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any 
and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the 
person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or 
disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If 
you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox 
and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an 
express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor 
does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a 
contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject 
to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding 
until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized 
signatory.
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to