Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] An 8 years perspective on broadband in the usa - fcc data

2022-06-20 Thread Dave Collier-Brown via Bloat
It may well* be more diagnostic than downstream latency, it's * commonly the requests that you want to get through, so you ca get downstream flows, and * enthusiastically avoided by the vendors as a metric (;-)) --dave c-b [* polite Canadian for "very much"] On 6/20/22 10:38, Fries,

Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] An 8 years perspective on broadband in the usa - fcc data

2022-06-20 Thread Fries, Justus via Bloat
No, we do not have that data aggregated. From: Dave Taht Sent: 20 June 2022 16:19:22 To: Fries, Justus Cc: bloat; Rpm; Sam Crawford Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] An 8 years perspective on broadband in the usa - fcc data I would characterize a goodly percentage of

Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] An 8 years perspective on broadband in the usa - fcc data

2022-06-20 Thread Dave Taht via Bloat
I would characterize a goodly percentage of the bufferbloat.net members' outputs as a war between creators and consumers, as a fight to keep networks usable during uploads. Do you have the upload latencies over time somewhere? On Mon, Jun 20, 2022, 5:37 AM Justus via Bloat wrote: > We are using

Re: [Bloat] [iccrg] Musings on the future of Internet Congestion Control

2022-06-20 Thread Michael Welzl via Bloat
> On Jun 19, 2022, at 6:53 PM, Sebastian Moeller via Bloat > wrote: > > I might be out to lunch here, but why not accept a "total" speed limit per > TCP flow and simply expect bulk transfers to employ more parallel streams; > which is what I think download manager apps are already doing for

Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] An 8 years perspective on broadband in the usa - fcc data

2022-06-20 Thread Justus via Bloat
We are using the latency under downstream load data for the paper. Regards Justus ___ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat