> On 11 Apr, 2023, at 5:12 am, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> I have no idea what an "adaptive LIFO" is, but the acm queue paper
> here just takes the defaults from codel...
>
> https://twitter.com/teivah/status/1645362443986640896
They're applying it to a server request queue, not a network packet queue
I have no idea what an "adaptive LIFO" is, but the acm queue paper
here just takes the defaults from codel...
https://twitter.com/teivah/status/1645362443986640896
And a go implementation of codel for queues in general has appeared
here: https://github.com/joshbohde/codel
--
AMA March 31: http
Showing more folk about how to look at bufferbloated packet captures
has long been on my mind. But my cup runneth over.
Anyone?
https://pretalx.packet-foo.com/sf23us/cfp
--
AMA March 31: https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-grant-events/dave-taht
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
___
-- Forwarded message -
From: WISPA
Date: Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 8:51 AM
Subject: Urgent - Help WISPA Address California's BEAD Plans
To: Dave Taht
Dave,
As you may have seen, the California Public Utilities Commission has begun
its discussion of how to write its BEAD rules by r
Hi Dave,
> On Apr 10, 2023, at 01:04, David Lang via Bloat
> wrote:
>
> TCP ramps up it's speed fairly slowly, and backs off fairly drastically when
> it is told (via ECN or a dropped packet) that it has hit the limit.
[SM] That is the prevailing narrative, yes. However during slow s
Which fits the word "bandlength" better than my discussion, which was an
experiment in explaining that latency has a cost to someone who doesn't
know waht it means.
--dave
On 4/9/23 19:04, David Lang via Bloat wrote:
TCP ramps up it's speed fairly slowly, and backs off fairly
drastically when i
