Re: [Bloat] mDNS

2024-02-28 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek via Bloat
>> I'm not sure how that could happen at boot time, it would need to >> happen whenever a DHCPv4 lease changes. This implies that the router >> might need to renumber if the ISP changes its allocation, and there are >> no renumbering procedures for IPv4 (I'm not sure if anyone implements >> RFC

[Bloat] latency on hackernews

2024-02-28 Thread Dave Taht via Bloat
This was delicious: "If latency doesn’t matter, can I create a service that cross-ships 1TB HDDs overnight and call it broadband?" - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39533800#39534166 Could someone weigh in over there with the current starlink measuremetns. On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:08 PM

Re: [Bloat] mDNS

2024-02-28 Thread Rich Brown via Bloat
I'm not advocating that we change the default OpenWrt address from 192.168.1.1 That's welded too deeply into our synapses (and documentation). But this proposal will benefit newcomers for the reasons described below. > On Feb 28, 2024, at 7:17 AM, David Lang wrote: > > remember, you don't

Re: [Bloat] mDNS

2024-02-28 Thread David Lang via Bloat
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Juliusz Chroboczek via Bloat wrote: But my point is that the OpenWrt router has no way to predict what address/subnet will be assigned to its WAN port. In principle, the ISP should assign either a global address, or an address in the range 100.64.0.0/10 (RFC 6598). This

Re: [Bloat] mDNS

2024-02-28 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek via Bloat
> But my point is that the OpenWrt router has no way to predict what > address/subnet will be assigned to its WAN port. In principle, the ISP should assign either a global address, or an address in the range 100.64.0.0/10 (RFC 6598). This range was deliberately chosen to not collide with RFC