Roland,
On 22/03/2019 13:53, Bless, Roland (TM) wrote:
Hi Bob,
see inline.
Am 21.03.19 um 14:24 schrieb Bob Briscoe:
On 21/03/2019 08:49, Bless, Roland (TM) wrote:
Hi,
Am 21.03.19 um 09:02 schrieb Bob Briscoe:
Just to rapidly reply,
On 21/03/2019 07:46, Jonathan Morton wrote:
The ECN
ound their
implementation. All we can do is publish as much as possible as early as
possible to try to keep some areas of the field open.
Bob
Thanks,
Alex
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019, 11:29:38 PM GMT, Bob Briscoe
wrote:
1/ In 2016, I arranged for the hire of a patent attorney to undertake the
unu
Roland,
On 21/03/2019 08:49, Bless, Roland (TM) wrote:
Hi,
Am 21.03.19 um 09:02 schrieb Bob Briscoe:
Just to rapidly reply,
On 21/03/2019 07:46, Jonathan Morton wrote:
The ECN field was never intended to be used as a classifier, except to
distinguish Not-ECT flows from ECT flows (which
--
Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
Jonathan,
On 20/03/2019 23:51, Jonathan Morton wrote:
On 21 Mar, 2019, at 1:29 am, Bob Briscoe wrote:
But more importantly, the L4S usage couples the minimized latency use
case to any possibility of getting a high fidelity explicit congestion
signal, so the "maximize throughput"
rmulation of ECT(1), which have more to do with the confusing
semantics and proliferation of corner cases it creates for CE and ECE.
But I thought I’d ask about them since it seemed like maybe there was a
disconnect here.
*From: *Bob Briscoe
*Date: *2019-03-18 at 18:07
*To: *"David P. Reed" , Vint C
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane
--
New postal address:
Google
1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor
Reston, VA 20190
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
__
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--
________
Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/
Matthias, Dave,
The sort of industrial control applications that detnet is targeting
require far lower queuing delay and jitter than fq_CoDel can give. They
have thrown around numbers like 250us jitter and 1E-9 to 1E-12 packet
loss probability.
However, like you, I just sigh when I see the
/russell_0296_indecent.article
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
Bob Briscoe, BT
Bob Briscoe, BT
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
=pns_catalogueorigin=mb_navigator_right_cd_editorial.jspevent=link.print.editorialPorS=productscontentType=techinicalspeccontentitemid=editorial/tech_spec/mpls_ts.xmlproductDetail=products/mpls.xmlspecification).
Bob
Bob Briscoe
Bob Briscoe,BT Innovate Design
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
Bob Briscoe,BT Innovate Design
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
/listinfo/bloat
Bob Briscoe,BT Innovate Design
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
15 matches
Mail list logo
