Re: [Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

2016-01-20 Thread moeller0
Hi Brandon, > On Jan 20, 2016, at 00:33 , Brandon Applegate wrote: > > Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know. > This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package... > > Hello, > > I’ve been reading all I can on the bufferbloat website and also trying to >

Re: [Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

2016-01-20 Thread moeller0
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:12 , Alan Jenkins > wrote: > > On 19/01/2016, Brandon Applegate wrote: >> Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know. >> This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package... >> >> Hello, >> >> I’ve been reading all I can on the bufferblo

Re: [Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

2016-01-20 Thread moeller0
Hi Alan, hi Brandon: > On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:15 , Alan Jenkins > wrote: > > On 20/01/2016, Alan Jenkins wrote: >> On 19/01/2016, Brandon Applegate wrote: >>> Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know. >>> This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package... >>>

Re: [Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

2016-01-20 Thread moeller0
Hi Alan, > On Jan 20, 2016, at 13:06 , Alan Jenkins > wrote: > [...] > No offense to your work on sqm-scripts. None taken ;) I really just want to use the opportunity to a) get Brandon up and running and b) fix any short-comings on sqm-scripts on the way. > > > 1) It's just in case

Re: [Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

2016-01-20 Thread moeller0
Hi Brandon, > On Jan 20, 2016, at 15:51 , Brandon Applegate wrote: > >> >> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Alan Jenkins >> wrote: >> >> >> No offense to your work on sqm-scripts. >> >> >> 1) It's just in case the problem is *outside* of sqm-scripts, it could be >> useful to try the minimum

Re: [Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

2016-01-20 Thread moeller0
Hi Brandon, > On Jan 20, 2016, at 17:10 , Brandon Applegate wrote: > > I’m getting more confused as I go on :) > > So I’ve rebooted and the tc classes seem to have come back. Since this is > Ubuntu 12.04 - it doesn NOT have systemd. I mention this because I see there > is a systemd config i

Re: [Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

2016-01-20 Thread moeller0
Hi Etienne, I could be out to lunch, but I always assumed for virtual interfaces the txque does not matter as packets are immediate passed to the real interface. Best Regards Sebastian > On Jan 20, 2016, at 18:09 , Etienne Champetier > wrote: > > > > 2016-01-20 17:54 GMT+01:00 Bran

Re: [Bloat] anyone have info on the netflix speed test (fast.com)?

2016-05-19 Thread moeller0
> On May 18, 2016, at 21:51 , David Lang wrote: > > /. is talking about a new speed test to show your download speed. It doesn’t > show upload speeds or ping time. From fast.com: What is Fast.com measuring? Fast.com estimates your current download speed. You will generally be able to get this

Re: [Bloat] anyone have info on the netflix speed test (fast.com)?

2016-05-19 Thread moeller0
Hi David. > On May 19, 2016, at 10:50 , David Lang wrote: > > On Thu, 19 May 2016, moeller0 wrote: >> […] >> This looks like marketing PR somehow inflicted the release of an internal >> demo. I agree with jb the one thing it has going for it is a short name… It

Re: [Bloat] new public web tests for bufferbloat

2016-06-02 Thread moeller0
Hi Dave, > On Jun 1, 2016, at 18:55 , Dave Taht wrote: > > see: http://labs.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/ > > (can't test myself, not being in england - can someone there test it > and post results/screenshots?) At least from Germany that test works, just leave both entry fields empt

Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat.net - Organizing, curating, and workflow

2016-06-12 Thread moeller0
So how do I contribute changes to existing pages? The cake page has some inaccuracies regarding VDSL2 encapsulation that I would like to fix… “Apparently PTM does have a small additional overhead on the order of 1⁄128, due to HDLC framing which attaches special meaning to 0x7D and 0x7E bytes; I

Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat.net - Organizing, curating, and workflow

2016-06-12 Thread moeller0
Hi Toke, > On Jun 12, 2016, at 20:16 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > moeller0 writes: > >> So how do I contribute changes to existing pages? The cake page has >> some inaccuracies regarding VDSL2 encapsulation that I would like to >> fix… > > Clone t

Re: [Bloat] Updates on www.bufferbloat.net

2016-07-07 Thread moeller0
fferbloat" - Gives information about what > you might do (leaving test descriptions on the previous page). > https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/What_to_do_about_Bufferbloat/ I see that there is a link to https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/sqm on this page, and that