Hi Frantisek,
> On Dec 11, 2023, at 20:33, Frantisek Borsik
> wrote:
>
> Hello Sebastian,
>
> So you have shared that "L$S bible" :-)
I even have some sympathy for his stance, by all means, flow rate
fairness is rarely optimal and with sufficient information it seems almost
Hello Sebastian,
So you have shared that "L$S bible" :-) with the bloat list and I do
believe that even people at NN list should read it:
https://pbg.cs.illinois.edu/courses/cs598fa09/readings/b07.pdf
Heck, everyone in the field should read it. Food for thought, certainly.
*Btw,
Hi Frantisek,
still keeping NNagain off-list, no need to infect yet another list with my L4S
aversion ;)
> On Dec 11, 2023, at 11:18, Frantisek Borsik
> wrote:
>
> …and I’m adding NN again, because:
>
> No matter which evil end game is actually the one, it will create a quite a
> havoc.
…and I’m adding NN again, because:
No matter which evil end game is actually the one, it will create a quite a
havoc.
Seeing, for example Netflix, participating in L4S trail (they said it was
for their cloud gaming, while at IETF 118) is in my mind the same like
seeing a capitalist, an
Hi Frantisek,
steering this to the bloat list, as I have a hunch my response might not be
appropriate for the wide audience in NNagain even though this can have NN
ramifications.
> On Dec 11, 2023, at 10:50, Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain
> wrote:
>
> Top story on HN:
>
>
