End-to-end queueing delay (aggregate of delays in all queues except for the
queues in the endpoints themselves) should typically never (never means <99.9%
of any hour-long period) exceed 200 msec. in the worst case, and if at all
possible never exceed 100 msec. in networks capable of carryin
On Dec 16, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Naeem Khademi
wrote:
> and to clarify more about what else was discussed, it seems to me some of us
> tend to correspond and relate the notion of "good queue" vs. "bad queue" used
> by KN+VJ ACM queue paper to my question on "good bursts". While they likely
> to
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:28:35PM +0200, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> I am also reminded of the livestreamed demoscene event from a couple of
> years ago, which was producing enormous aggregate bursts every time a frame
> group completed encoding (multiple times a second). This wasn't enough on
> a s
On 16 Dec, 2013, at 3:47 pm, Naeem Khademi wrote:
> An example: when designing my AQM X should I care about 64K TSO-generated
> bursts to safely pass without dropping or not?
If there is at least 6Mbps bandwidth downstream of your queue, then codel at
least will pass such a burst in isolation.
and to clarify more about what else was discussed, it seems to me some of
us tend to correspond and relate the notion of "good queue" vs. "bad queue"
used by KN+VJ ACM queue paper to my question on "good bursts". While they
likely to be correlated (I have no argument on this now), the notion of
"go
Bob, Fred and all
I'll copy/paste the question here again: "what is a good burst (size) that
AQMs should allow?" and/or "how an AQM can have a notion of the right burst
size?"
So, obviously, as Bob mentioned, I'm concerned about what AQMs should or
shouldn't do. The mission of dealing with packet
On Dec 15, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Bob Briscoe
wrote:
> Fred,
>
> Jonathan Morton, Michael Scharf & I took Naeem's question to mean "What
> should an AQM assume the size of a good burst is?" whereas I think you and
> David C-B took the question to mean "What should an end-system take the size
> o
Fred,
Jonathan Morton, Michael Scharf & I took Naeem's question to mean
"What should an AQM assume the size of a good burst is?" whereas I
think you and David C-B took the question to mean "What should an
end-system take the size of a good burst to be?".
Naeem, could you clarify which you we
