Dave Collier-Brown writes:
> Alas, once I looked under the covers, it doesn't look easy at all.
> Definitely not a weekend project.
>
> I used to use QEF, and this reminds me of it.
Looks eminently copy-paste'able from that sfq commit you linked, though :)
-Toke
___
Alas, once I looked under the covers, it doesn't look easy at all.
Definitely not a weekend project.
I used to use QEF, and this reminds me of it.
--dave
On 2020-10-05 1:33 p.m., Jonathan Morton wrote:
On 5 Oct, 2020, at 7:13 pm, David Collier-Brown wrote:
By pure luck, I ended up chatting w
This appears to be adding a tree of static data structures so nmcli can
understand what the options are, including what the defaults are.
If so, I can probably stop it after the command parser runs, and not have a
huge build-and-test-everything task.
--dave
On 2020-10-05 1:33 p.m., Jonathan M
> On 5 Oct, 2020, at 7:13 pm, David Collier-Brown wrote:
>
> By pure luck, I ended up chatting with one of the NetworkManager chaps, who
> invited a merge request with the proper parameters for CAKE.
>
> He wrote
>
> Currently NM doesn't support configuring CAKE parameters. IOW, if you
> set "
By pure luck, I ended up chatting with one of the NetworkManager chaps,
who invited a merge request with the proper parameters for CAKE.
He wrote
Currently NM doesn't support configuring CAKE parameters. IOW, if you
set "root cake bandwidth 100Mbit", you will see in the tc output that
cake was