Re: [Bloat] Another passive bandwidth estimation method

2023-08-01 Thread Michael Menth via Bloat
Hi Dave, well, I don't see DSCD as a competitor with cake or fq-pie. DSCD is not primarily an aqm mechanism but its central objective is prioritizing ABE traffic without harming BE traffic. This idea is more than 20 years old, but scalable algorithms were not available, DSCD fills this gap.

Re: [Bloat] Another passive bandwidth estimation method

2023-08-01 Thread Dave Taht via Bloat
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 1:24 AM Michael Menth wrote: > > Hi all, > > here is a private copy for personal use: > > http://atlas.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/menth/papers/Menth21-Sub-6-accepted.pdf Very interesting, thank you. So great you have code on github! I appreciate the mention of cake, and I figure

Re: [Bloat] Another passive bandwidth estimation method

2023-08-01 Thread Michael Menth via Bloat
Hi all, here is a private copy for personal use: http://atlas.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/menth/papers/Menth21-Sub-6-accepted.pdf Kind regards Michael Am 01.08.2023 um 09:51 schrieb Sebastian Moeller: Hi Michael, that "teaser" you wrote is certainly interesting. Would you be able to distribute

Re: [Bloat] Another passive bandwidth estimation method

2023-08-01 Thread Sebastian Moeller via Bloat
Hi Michael, that "teaser" you wrote is certainly interesting. Would you be able to distribute author copies to those of us that do not subscribe to IEEExplore, please? Regards Sebastian > On Aug 1, 2023, at 09:32, Michael Menth via Bloat > wrote: > > Hi all, > > we've recently

[Bloat] Another passive bandwidth estimation method

2023-08-01 Thread Michael Menth via Bloat
Hi all, we've recently developed a passive method for finding a link's capacity (in a different context). You find the algorithm in III.B.5 in https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9954450 The approach ist tested in V.B for 1, 10, and 100 Gb/s links on a Linux server and provides sufficiently