El lun., 15 jun. 2020 06:15, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen escribió:
> Sergio Belkin writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've seen that many of the recommended tools to diagnose/troubleshoot
> > bufferbloat use netperf.
> > Netperf in https://github.com/HewlettPackard/netperf has many years of
> > inactivity. In
--- Begin Message ---
Sergio Belkin writes:
> Hi,
> I've seen that many of the recommended tools to diagnose/troubleshoot
> bufferbloat use netperf.
> Netperf in https://github.com/HewlettPackard/netperf has many years of
> inactivity. In fact, in recent versions of distros don't include it.
>
Hi Sergio,
IMHO netperf is a convenient toll to generate load, and for measuring
bufferbloat, or latency under load increase, generating saturating loads is an
important step. So I see no reason why the fct that netperf is relatively
mature and sees only little change nowadays speaks against
Hi,
I've seen that many of the recommended tools to diagnose/troubleshoot
bufferbloat use netperf.
Netperf in https://github.com/HewlettPackard/netperf has many years of
inactivity. In fact, in recent versions of distros don't include it.
So, my question is: is still netperf a reliable tool?
