On Jan 22 2012, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Karol M. Langner
> >> They sure are independent, if that's what you mean by orthogonal,
> >> but many people would claim they are correlated (at least statistic
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Karol M. Langner
>> They sure are independent, if that's what you mean by orthogonal,
>> but many people would claim they are correlated (at least statistically).
>>
> Yes - they are independent variables
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Karol M. Langner
wrote:
> On Jan 22 2012, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > Right. Prestige is orthogonal to quality, but serves it role. (OA is
> > orthogonal to quality too).
> >
> > Egon
>
> They sure are independent, if that's what you mean by orthogonal,
> but many
On Jan 22 2012, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Karol M. Langner
> wrote:
> > Thanks for that info. I suppose small volume is good thing for a
> > high profile journal. And a high rejection rate means publication
> > in that journal will be a privelege, right?
>
> Right
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Karol M. Langner
wrote:
> Thanks for that info. I suppose small volume is good thing for a
> high profile journal. And a high rejection rate means publication
> in that journal will be a privelege, right?
Right. Prestige is orthogonal to quality, but serves it rol
On Jan 19 2012, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Karol M. Langner
> wrote:
>
> >
> > One thing that occurred to me while reading this article was that OA would
> > probably benefit a lot from an elite, high profile journal. One that could
> > seriously compete with the l
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Karol M. Langner
wrote:
>
> One thing that occurred to me while reading this article was that OA would
> probably benefit a lot from an elite, high profile journal. One that could
> seriously compete with the likes of Nature or Science. Sounds a little
> far-fetche
On Jan 18 2012, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Jérôme Pansanel
> wrote:
>
> > Dears,
> >
> > Did some one read this article:
> >
> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/jan/16/academic-publishers-enemies-science
> >
>
> Yes - Mike Taylor asked by to review it befo
rganised they haven't responded
on where to post petitions
> **
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bob
>
> *From:* Peter Murray-Rust [mailto:pm...@cam.ac.uk]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:49 AM
> *To:* Jérôme Pansanel
> *Cc:* blueobelisk
/?cid=FB_TAF
Cheers,
Bob
From: Peter Murray-Rust [mailto:pm...@cam.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:49 AM
To: Jérôme Pansanel
Cc: blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BlueObelisk-discuss] Article in The Guardian
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Jérôme
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Jérôme Pansanel wrote:
> Dears,
>
> Did some one read this article:
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/jan/16/academic-publishers-enemies-science
>
Yes - Mike Taylor asked by to review it before publication. I think it's
very powerful.
I hope that this pu
Dears,
Did some one read this article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/jan/16/academic-publishers-enemies-science
Any comment about it?
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The
12 matches
Mail list logo
