At 21:50 22/09/2007, Martin A. Walker wrote:
>I think the new InChIKey (or "hashed InChI) should meet this need, without
>us having to create a BO identifier:
>http://www.iupac.org/inchi/release102.html
>Do you think this would work?
Yes. And I think it should probably be used.
>ACD and JChemPai
On Sep 24, 2007, at 7:40 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Funny you mention this... last week in Ulm, someone suggested (forgot
> who) during the CIC-CINF session that one reason against open access
> chemistry is the (increased) risk of chemical terrorism :)
Shouldn't the gene sequence community b
Hi Peter,
On 9/22/07, peter murray-rust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The discussion on InChIs raises the question as to who creates and
> manages communal resources and metadata. InChIs work as they are
> algorithmic but they fail for inorganics (especially mineral
> polymorphs) and substances ("g
I think the new InChIKey (or "hashed InChI) should meet this need, without
us having to create a BO identifier:
http://www.iupac.org/inchi/release102.html
Do you think this would work?
ACD and JChemPaint have already done versions that generate
"Wikipedia-ready" PNG files with embedded InChIs. Th
The discussion on InChIs raises the question as to who creates and
manages communal resources and metadata. InChIs work as they are
algorithmic but they fail for inorganics (especially mineral
polymorphs) and substances ("glucose", "glutamate"), etc. where
conventional human-assigned identifier
