[BlueOnyx:22109] Re: Attn. German BlueOnyx users: DSGVO update (again!)

2018-05-24 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Ken, > If website logfiles are to be purged after 7 or 14 days, > are you allowed to keep website analytics as long as they are > anonymous, i.e. divorced from visitor identification like IP > addresses? I'm talking about counts of pageviews and unique visitors, > top referrers and entry

[BlueOnyx:22108] Re: Attn. German BlueOnyx users: DSGVO update (again!)

2018-05-24 Thread Ken Hohhof
If website logfiles are to be purged after 7 or 14 days, are you allowed to keep website analytics as long as they are anonymous, i.e. divorced from visitor identification like IP addresses? I'm talking about counts of pageviews and unique visitors, top referrers and entry pages, browsers,

[BlueOnyx:22107] Attn. German BlueOnyx users: DSGVO update (again!)

2018-05-24 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi all, First of all I'd like to thank Dirk Estenfeld to bring this to my attention. On 25th May 2018 the DSGVO (GDPR) comes into effect. To that end we already published updates for BlueOnyx which allow you to configure data retention and expiry. German BlueOnyx operators need to pay special

[BlueOnyx:22106] Re: ownCloud

2018-05-24 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Richard, > In a previous thread, ownCloud was recommended as a package to use for > file sharing. I installed it and it looks good but there is an error. > “No memory cache has been configured. To enhance your performance please > configure a memcache if available”.   > > Is it possible to

[BlueOnyx:22105] ownCloud

2018-05-24 Thread Richard Sidlin
In a previous thread, ownCloud was recommended as a package to use for file sharing. I installed it and it looks good but there is an error. "No memory cache has been configured. To enhance your performance please configure a memcache if available". Is it possible to install a memcache or is

[BlueOnyx:22104] Re: IPv6 configuration - sendmail down

2018-05-24 Thread Jochen Demmer
Hi Michael, thank you for your answer. Why can't I set a link local as default gateway? That's common practice. I did of course not set fe80:: as gateway address, I just left out the last 112 bit of the address. I manually removed the prefix information from sendmail.cf and it seems to be