On 23 February 2012 10:35, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Jaime,
>
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 20:13 +0100, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
> > does anyone have a reliable source for the actual Office Suite Maket
> Share?
>
> Not really a question for the board list :-)
>
> > Basically I need to know how is
On 13 September 2011 13:32, Charles-H. Schulz <
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hello Ian, Tom, Paulo,
>
> 2011/9/13 Ian Lynch
>
> > > > The general notion here was that
> > > > having a separate Base list would not serve the purpose -
>
> > The general notion here was that
> > having a separate Base list would not serve the purpose - so what
> > other, concrete proposals are there to discuss within the SC?
>
> The general notion you're saying, IMHO, comes from people who are not
> directly involved in Base's issue itself. How ma
On 13 September 2011 07:47, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> On 13/09/2011 08:43, Ian Lynch wrote:
>
>> I think part of the problem is the rise of client server databases with
>> the
>> internet. It's a bit of an irony because to start with OOo used the
>> principle
I think part of the problem is the rise of client server databases with the
internet. It's a bit of an irony because to start with OOo used the
principle of connecting to a database rather than including the old Addabas
that was with StarOffice. Snag now is that even if the use of Base is
minority
Oops forgot the link!
Its here
https://theingots.org/community/OOoCert
On 8 September 2011 11:50, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 15:56, Tom Davies wrote:
>
>> Hi :)
>> "Bad" was not really the right word. "Negative" would have been more apt.
>
Charles.
> Le 7 sept. 2011 15:11, "Tom Davies" a écrit :
> > Hi :)
> > Fantastic :) I think i only read the bad parts of Charles' post &
> completely
> > missed the good. Great to hear it's beginning to click into place :)
> > Regards from
> > T
Ok, no problem, that is what we intended. We have had internet problems at
the hotel so I only have my phone. Tomorrow I can make a better reply. I had
a meeting with Manfred Reiter this morning about further EU project grant
applications so we hope that tdf people can become involved. But more
tom
Yes, both on handbook, training materials etc (need to edit the current hand
book draft as it only refers to ooo at present.) For certs either libo or
ooo depending on the user context. Any specific community requirements, we
will respect.
Ian
Sent from my Android Smartphone.
www.theingots.org
On
Background
As many will know we have been working on FOSS friendly qualifications for
end-users for several years now through the INGOT project. The
qualifications and associated certificates are differentiated across 6
levels covering all software applications from complete beginner to
university
On 5 June 2011 17:31, Sam Ruby wrote:
> 2011/6/5 André Schnabel :
> >
> > In your questionary, the questions to me seem to be of two kinds:
> >
> > 1) questions that are targeted to individuals actions (sign Apache CLA,
> > contribute code to Apache as well as to TDF ...)
> >
> > 2) fundamental q
11 matches
Mail list logo
