Re: [board-discuss] [4.0] Review

2013-02-18 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2013-02-13 12:05: as 4.0.0 is rolled out there should be a review about what happened: The good points, the bad points What can we do in the same way, what in a better way the next time? What is needed to get it better? A discussion may cause some budget

Re: [board-discuss] [4.0] Review

2013-02-13 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello K-J, thanks for your email. You are right but I don't think it will be formal. However we must do it one way or another. Best, Charles. "klaus-jürgen weghorn ol" a écrit : >Hi to all board members, >as 4.0.0 is rolled out there should be a review about what happened: > >The good points

Re: [board-discuss] [4.0] Review

2013-02-13 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Klaus, On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 12:05 +0100, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote: > Hi to all board members, > as 4.0.0 is rolled out there should be a review about what happened: > > The good points, the bad points > What can we do in the same way, what in a better way the next time? > What is needed

[board-discuss] [4.0] Review

2013-02-13 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Hi to all board members, as 4.0.0 is rolled out there should be a review about what happened: The good points, the bad points What can we do in the same way, what in a better way the next time? What is needed to get it better? A discussion may cause some budget thoughts, community handling, market